# ChartQA leaderboard

external benchmark

> Every figure below is reproduced as its upstream source published it: nothing is modelled, estimated, interpolated or converted. `Unavailable` means no source published the value — it is never a zero. Each value carries its evidence state and the date it was observed.

Page: https://modelscale.dev/leaderboards/benchmarks/external-chart-qa-provider-reports

Every model the catalog carries a published ChartQA value for, ranked by that value.

## Benchmark record

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Category | external |
| Measure | Provider-reported aggregates; separate source cohorts |
| Tasks | — |
| Difficulty | — |
| Published by | [ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning](https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.10244) |

ChartQA tests visual and logical reasoning about charts. These own-provider reports keep Anthropic's relaxed-accuracy results separate from Zyphra scores whose metric and scorer are not disclosed.

## ChartQA ranking

No model in the catalog has a published ChartQA score. The benchmark is defined by ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning, but the catalog carries no value for it yet. An absent value is shown as absent here rather than as a zero.

Rows are ordered by the value the source published, highest first. The source does not state whether a higher value is the better result, so this document does not either: for a benchmark that measures a rate of failure, read the table from the bottom.