# MathVista leaderboard

external benchmark

> Every figure below is reproduced as its upstream source published it: nothing is modelled, estimated, interpolated or converted. `Unavailable` means no source published the value — it is never a zero. Each value carries its evidence state and the date it was observed.

Page: https://modelscale.dev/leaderboards/benchmarks/external-math-vista-testmini

Every model the catalog carries a published MathVista value for, ranked by that value.

## Benchmark record

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Category | external |
| Measure | Published accuracy (%) |
| Tasks | 1,000 examples in the testmini split |
| Difficulty | Mathematical reasoning in visual contexts |
| Published by | [MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contexts](https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.02255) |

MathVista tests mathematical reasoning about images. This table shows published accuracy on the testmini split, with each source configuration kept separate. The results are display only and do not enter overall or category rankings.

## MathVista ranking

No model in the catalog has a published MathVista score. The benchmark is defined by MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contexts, but the catalog carries no value for it yet. An absent value is shown as absent here rather than as a zero.

Rows are ordered by the value the source published, highest first. The source does not state whether a higher value is the better result, so this document does not either: for a benchmark that measures a rate of failure, read the table from the bottom.