# Multi-IF leaderboard

external benchmark

> Every figure below is reproduced as its upstream source published it: nothing is modelled, estimated, interpolated or converted. `Unavailable` means no source published the value — it is never a zero. Each value carries its evidence state and the date it was observed.

Page: https://modelscale.dev/leaderboards/benchmarks/external-multi-if-author-turn-reports

Every model the catalog carries a published Multi-IF value for, ranked by that value.

## Benchmark record

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Category | external |
| Measure | Turn-specific accuracy average on a 0-1 scale |
| Tasks | 4,501 three-turn conversations in eight languages |
| Difficulty | — |
| Published by | [Multi-IF: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn and Multilingual Instructions Following](https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.15553v2) |

Multi-IF tests instruction following over three turns in eight languages. This selected historical author report preserves each turn score, dated API identifier, and generation settings for four models.

## Multi-IF ranking

No model in the catalog has a published Multi-IF score. The benchmark is defined by Multi-IF: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn and Multilingual Instructions Following, but the catalog carries no value for it yet. An absent value is shown as absent here rather than as a zero.

Rows are ordered by the value the source published, highest first. The source does not state whether a higher value is the better result, so this document does not either: for a benchmark that measures a rate of failure, read the table from the bottom.