# RULER leaderboard

external benchmark

> Every figure below is reproduced as its upstream source published it: nothing is modelled, estimated, interpolated or converted. `Unavailable` means no source published the value — it is never a zero. Each value carries its evidence state and the date it was observed.

Page: https://modelscale.dev/leaderboards/benchmarks/external-ruler-context-reports

RULER context-length reports. Every model the catalog carries a published RULER value for, ranked by that value.

## Benchmark record

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Category | external |
| Measure | Reported score by context length |
| Tasks | 13 tasks in the original author cohort; IBM task count undisclosed |
| Difficulty | — |
| Published by | [RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?](https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.06654v3) |

Selected original RULER context sweeps and separate IBM Granite 4.2 reports. The table keeps each source cohort and context length explicit; 128K is the displayed score, and the results do not enter rankings.

## RULER ranking

No model in the catalog has a published RULER score. The benchmark is defined by RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?, but the catalog carries no value for it yet. An absent value is shown as absent here rather than as a zero.

Rows are ordered by the value the source published, highest first. The source does not state whether a higher value is the better result, so this document does not either: for a benchmark that measures a rate of failure, read the table from the bottom.