# Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)

Anthropic · Proprietary · rank 19 · bench-align-v5

> Every figure below is reproduced as its upstream source published it: nothing is modelled, estimated, interpolated or converted. `Unavailable` means no source published the value — it is never a zero. Each value carries its evidence state and the date it was observed.

Page: https://modelscale.dev/models/claude-opus-4-7-max  
JSON: https://modelscale.dev/api/model/claude-opus-4-7-max

## Facts

| Field | Value | Evidence |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Canonical id | `claude-opus-4-7-max` | — |
| Overall score | 69.59 | Observed 2026-09-22 · source benchlm:models |
| Context window | 1M tokens | Observed 2026-09-22 · source benchlm:models |
| Release date | 2026-04-16 | Observed 2026-09-22 · source benchlm:models |
| Access type | Proprietary | — |
| Blended $/1M (75% input / 25% output) | $10.00 | Derived from the input and output rates below |

## Capability evidence

Seven axes from the ranking source. An axis the source did not score is unavailable, not zero.

| Axis | Score | Evidence |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Agentic | 64.7 | Observed 2026-09-22 · source benchlm:models |
| Coding | 62.8 | Observed 2026-09-22 · source benchlm:models |
| Knowledge | 81.7 | Observed 2026-09-22 · source benchlm:models |
| Reasoning | 49.7 | Observed 2026-09-22 · source benchlm:models |
| Multimodal & Grounded | 50.1 | Observed 2026-09-22 · source benchlm:models |
| Instruction Following | Unavailable | Unavailable · source benchlm:models |
| Math | Unavailable | Unavailable · source benchlm:models |

## Runtime service evidence

Measured values with the date they were observed. Nothing is inferred from a sibling model or a provider claim. Regional or per-endpoint measurements appear only when the API supplies them; none are modelled.

| Measurement | Value | Observed | Last good | Evidence |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Time to first token | Unavailable | Unavailable | Unavailable | Unavailable · source benchlm:speed |
| Throughput | Unavailable | Unavailable | Unavailable | Unavailable · source benchlm:speed |

## Endpoint and price matrix

Every published price component, including cache reads and writes.

| Component | USD | Evidence |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Input / 1M tokens | $5.00 | Observed 2026-09-22 · source benchlm:pricing |
| Output / 1M tokens | $25.00 | Observed 2026-09-22 · source benchlm:pricing |
| Cache read / 1M tokens | Unavailable | Unavailable · source benchlm:pricing |
| Cache write / 1M tokens | Unavailable | Unavailable · source openrouter:pricing |
| Blended / 1M (75% input / 25% output) | $10.00 | Derived — from the input and output rates above; it has no source record of its own |
| Cost per successful task (LiveBench) | Unavailable | Unavailable · source livebench:table |

**Self-hosted listing.** Anthropic official pricing for Claude Opus 4.7 applies to the adaptive reasoning variant as the same API model with effort controls; launch announcement states pricing remains $5 input / $25 output per million tokens. The rates above are a hosted price matched from another provider, not a first-party list price.

## Workload-aware monthly cost example

10 conversations per day × 8 messages × 22 active days, 1200 input and 400 output tokens per message, no cache. Derived here from the published rates above by this site's own calculator — not a figure any source published.

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Modelled monthly cost | $28.16 |
| Modelled tokens | 2.82M |

## Benchmark record

37 matched benchmark rows with their published value, unit, and provenance.

### Knowledge

| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| GPQA (Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A) | 94.2 | 448 questions | Graduate level | [GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark](https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.12022) |
| GPQA-D (GPQA Diamond) | 94.2 | Graduate-level science questions | Graduate level | [Trinity-Large-Thinking: Scaling an Open Source Frontier Agent](https://www.arcee.ai/blog/trinity-large-thinking) |
| HLE (Humanity's Last Exam) | 54.7 | Expert-level questions | Frontier expert level | [Humanity's Last Exam](https://lastexam.ai/) |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index | 40.7 | Cross-benchmark intelligence index | Display-only external reference | [Artificial Analysis](https://artificialanalysis.ai/) |
| AA-GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis GPQA Diamond) | 91.4 | Graduate-level science questions | Graduate-level science reasoning | [Artificial Analysis GPQA Diamond Benchmark Leaderboard](https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/gpqa-diamond) |
| AA-HLE (Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam) | 42.3 | Expert-level questions | Frontier expert reasoning | [Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam Benchmark Leaderboard](https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/hle) |
| AA-Omniscience Index (Artificial Analysis Omniscience Index) | 27.3 | Knowledge questions | Broad factual knowledge | [AA-Omniscience: Knowledge and Hallucination Benchmark](https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/omniscience) |
| AA-Omniscience Accuracy (Artificial Analysis Omniscience Accuracy) | 48.9 | Knowledge questions | Broad knowledge | [Artificial Analysis model benchmarks](https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/grok-4-3) |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate (Artificial Analysis Omniscience Hallucination Rate) | 42.3 | Knowledge questions | Factuality | [Artificial Analysis model benchmarks](https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/grok-4-3) |
| HLE w/o tools (Humanity's Last Exam without tools) | 46.9 | Expert-level questions | Frontier expert level | [Introducing GPT-5.4 mini and nano](https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-5-4-mini-and-nano/) |

### Coding

| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 69.4 | Terminal-based software tasks | Professional software engineering | [Terminal-Bench 2.0](https://www.tbench.ai/) |
| SWE-bench Verified (Software Engineering Benchmark Verified) | 87.6 | 500 verified issues | Professional software engineering | [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06770) |
| SWE-bench Pro | 64.3 | 1,865 repository problems | Long-horizon professional engineering | [SWE-Bench Pro: Can AI Agents Solve Long-Horizon Software Engineering Tasks?](https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.16941) |
| AA Coding Index (Artificial Analysis Coding Index) | 73.6 | Cross-benchmark coding index | Display-only external reference | [Artificial Analysis model leaderboards](https://artificialanalysis.ai/leaderboards/models) |

### Mathematics

| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| FrontierMath (legacy) (FrontierMath legacy aggregate) | 43.8 | Historical aggregate | Research-level mathematics | [FrontierMath: A Benchmark for Evaluating Advanced Mathematical Reasoning in AI](https://epoch.ai/frontiermath) |

### Reasoning

| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| MRCR v2 128K-256K (OpenAI MRCR v2 8-needle 128K-256K) | 59.2 | 8-needle retrieval tasks | Very long-context reasoning | [Introducing GPT-5.4 mini and nano](https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-5-4-mini-and-nano/) |
| ARC-AGI-2 (Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus for AGI v2) | 75.8 | Visual pattern completion and abstract reasoning | Expert-level — hardest public reasoning benchmark | [ARC-AGI-2: A Harder General Intelligence Benchmark](https://arcprize.org/arc-agi/2/) |
| ARC-AGI-3 (Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus for AGI v3) | 0.18 | Interactive game-like tasks with hidden rules | Frontier agentic reasoning | [ARC-AGI-3: A New Challenge for Frontier Agentic Intelligence](https://arcprize.org/media/ARC_AGI_3_Technical_Report.pdf) |
| AA-LCR (Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning) | 78.7 | Long-context reasoning tasks | Long-context reasoning | [Artificial Analysis model benchmarks](https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/grok-4-3) |
| CritPt (Critical Physics Tasks) | 12.0 | Research-level physics questions | Research-level physics reasoning | [CritPt Benchmark Leaderboard](https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/critpt) |

### Instruction Following

| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| AA-IFBench (Artificial Analysis IFBench) | 58.6 | Verifiable instruction constraints | Instruction precision | [Artificial Analysis IFBench Benchmark Leaderboard](https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/ifbench) |

### Agentic

| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| AA ITBench (Artificial Analysis ITBench-AA) | 46.7 | IT incident-response tasks | Enterprise IT operations | [Artificial Analysis ITBench-AA Benchmark Leaderboard](https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/itbench-aa) |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 69.4 | Terminal-based software tasks | Professional software engineering | [Terminal-Bench 2.0](https://www.tbench.ai/) |
| BrowseComp | 79.3 | Research questions requiring browsing | Hard web research | [BrowseComp](https://openai.com/index/browsecomp/) |
| GDPval-AA | 1396 | Agentic real-world work tasks | Professional agentic workflows | [DeepSeek-V4 Technical Report](https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro/blob/main/DeepSeek_V4.pdf) |
| GDPval-AA (GDPval-AA normalized) | 41.9 | Economically valuable tasks | Professional agentic workflows | [Artificial Analysis model benchmarks](https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/grok-4-3) |
| AA Agentic Index (Artificial Analysis Agentic Index) | 39.5 | Cross-benchmark agentic index | Display-only external reference | [Artificial Analysis model leaderboards](https://artificialanalysis.ai/leaderboards/models) |
| OSWorld-Verified | 78 | 369 real-world computer tasks (361 when eight Google Drive tasks are excluded) | Multi-step desktop and cross-application workflows | [OSWorld](https://os-world.github.io/) |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 18.2 | 108 long-horizon computer-use workflows | Long-horizon professional workflows | [OSWorld2.0: Benchmarking Computer Use Agents on Long-Horizon Real-World Tasks](https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.29537) |
| CyberGym | 73.1 | 1,507 vulnerability analysis instances | Real-world cybersecurity | [CyberGym: Evaluating AI Agents' Real-World Cybersecurity Capabilities at Scale](https://www.cybergym.io/) |
| JobBench | 45.9 | 130 tasks across 35 occupations | Professional multi-source workflows | [JobBench: Aligning Agent Work With Human Will](https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26329) |
| MCP Atlas | 77.3 | Tool-integrated agent tasks | Advanced tool use | [Introducing GPT-5.4 mini and nano](https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-5-4-mini-and-nano/) |
| τ²-bench results (τ²-Bench Tool-Agent-User Evaluation) | 88.6 | Airline, retail, and telecom customer-service task sets | Dual-control customer-service workflows | [τ²-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment](https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.07982) |

### Multimodal & Grounded

| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| AA-MMMU-Pro (Artificial Analysis MMMU-Pro) | 78.8 | Multimodal academic reasoning | Frontier multimodal | [Artificial Analysis MMMU-Pro Benchmark Leaderboard](https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/mmmu-pro) |
| OfficeQA Pro | 43.6 | Document and spreadsheet tasks | Enterprise grounded reasoning | [OfficeQA Pro: An Enterprise Benchmark for End-to-End Grounded Reasoning](https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08655) |
| CharXiv (CharXiv Reasoning) | 91 | Scientific chart reasoning | Scientific visualization reasoning | [CharXiv: Charting Gaps in Realistic Chart Understanding in Multimodal LLMs](https://charxiv.github.io/) |
| CharXiv w/o tools (CharXiv Reasoning without tools) | 82.1 | Scientific chart reasoning (tool-free) | Scientific visualization reasoning | [CharXiv: Charting Gaps in Realistic Chart Understanding in Multimodal LLMs](https://charxiv.github.io/) |

## Lifecycle and limitations log

Lifecycle events the source associates with this model.

No lifecycle event references this model. That is not evidence the model has no lifecycle plan — only that this source published none.

## What this profile does not claim

Values are reproduced exactly as their sources published them, in the units those sources declared; none are converted, interpolated, or averaged across providers. Any field marked unavailable was attempted and not returned. Last attempted fetch for this model's score: 2026-09-22 10:17 UTC.