CE
Celeris-1
Celeris · Proprietary · bench-align-v5
Canonical idceleris-1
Access typeProprietary
Blended $/1M$0.3375% input / 25% output
Capability shape
Seven axes from the ranking source. A missing axis is drawn as a gap.
Runtime service evidence
Measured values with the date they were observed. Nothing is inferred from a sibling model or a provider claim.
Time to first token: latency to the first answer chunk (Artificial Analysis, via BenchLM). Reasoning models include thinking time, so values can run to tens or hundreds of seconds.
Evidence key: ObservedUnavailable
| Measurement | Value | Observed | Last good | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time to first token | 0.6 s | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 | |
| Throughput | 1,418 tok/s | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
Regional or per-endpoint measurements appear only when the API supplies them; none are modelled here.
Endpoint and price matrix
Every published price component, including cache reads and writes.
| Component | USD | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.20 | |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.70 | |
| Cache read / 1M tokens | Unavailable | |
| Cache write / 1M tokens | Unavailable | |
| Blended / 1M (75% input / 25% output) | $0.33 |
Self-hosted listingCeleris's official pricing guide lists $0.20 per million prompt tokens and $0.70 per million completion tokens. The official model guide lists a 131,072-token combined prompt and requested-output limit.The rates above are a hosted price matched from another provider, not a first-party list price.
Workload-aware monthly cost example
10 conversations per day × 8 messages × 22 active days, 1200 input and 400 output tokens per message, no cache. This uses the same calculator as the cost simulator, so an unavailable applicable rate makes the example unavailable too.
Benchmark record
17 matched benchmark rows with their published value, unit, and provenance.
Knowledge
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro Massive Multitask Language Understanding Professional | 75.9 | Multiple subjects | Professional level | MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index | 6.3 | Cross-benchmark intelligence index | Display-only external reference | Artificial Analysis |
| AA-GPQA Diamond Artificial Analysis GPQA Diamond | 63.1 | Graduate-level science questions | Graduate-level science reasoning | Artificial Analysis GPQA Diamond Benchmark Leaderboard |
| AA-HLE Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam | 6.8 | Expert-level questions | Frontier expert reasoning | Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam Benchmark Leaderboard |
| AA-Omniscience Index Artificial Analysis Omniscience Index | -71.6 | Knowledge questions | Broad factual knowledge | AA-Omniscience: Knowledge and Hallucination Benchmark |
| AA-Omniscience Accuracy Artificial Analysis Omniscience Accuracy | 11.0 | Knowledge questions | Broad knowledge | Artificial Analysis model benchmarks |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate Artificial Analysis Omniscience Hallucination Rate | 92.8 | Knowledge questions | Factuality | Artificial Analysis model benchmarks |
Coding
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA Coding Index Artificial Analysis Coding Index | 14.4 | Cross-benchmark coding index | Display-only external reference | Artificial Analysis model leaderboards |
| AA-SciCode Artificial Analysis SciCode | 21.6 | Scientific coding subproblems | Scientific programming | Artificial Analysis SciCode Benchmark Leaderboard |
Mathematics
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSM8K Grade School Math 8K | 93.7 | Grade-school math word problems | Grade-school math | DeepSeek-V4 Technical Report |
Reasoning
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DROP Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphs | 81.4 | Paragraph reasoning questions | Reading and numerical reasoning | DeepSeek-V4 Technical Report |
| AA-LCR Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning | 38.0 | Long-context reasoning tasks | Long-context reasoning | Artificial Analysis model benchmarks |
| CritPt Critical Physics Tasks | 0.0 | Research-level physics questions | Research-level physics reasoning | CritPt Benchmark Leaderboard |
Instruction Following
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFEval Instruction-Following Eval | 80.8 | 541 prompts across 25 instruction types | Instruction precision | Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Models |
Agentic
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDPval-AA GDPval-AA | 483 | Agentic real-world work tasks | Professional agentic workflows | DeepSeek-V4 Technical Report |
| GDPval-AA GDPval-AA normalized | 0.0 | Economically valuable tasks | Professional agentic workflows | Artificial Analysis model benchmarks |
| AA Agentic Index Artificial Analysis Agentic Index | 0.7 | Cross-benchmark agentic index | Display-only external reference | Artificial Analysis model leaderboards |
Lifecycle and limitations log
Lifecycle events the source associates with this model, plus what this profile does not claim.
What this profile does not claimValues are reproduced exactly as their sources published them, in the units those sources declared; none are converted, interpolated, or averaged across providers. Any field marked unavailable was attempted and not returned — the attempt timestamp is in each badge. Last attempted fetch for this model’s score: 2026-09-17 18:17 UTC.