Skip to main content
ModelScale

Claude Fable 5.1

Anthropic · Proprietary · rank 1 · bench-align-v5

Canonical idclaude-fable-5-1
Overall score84.76
Context window1M tokens
Release date2026-09-01
Access typeProprietary
Blended $/1M$20.0075% input / 25% output

Capability shape

Seven axes from the ranking source. A missing axis is drawn as a gap.

Capability evidence

Agentic60.8
Coding90.4
Knowledge97.5
Reasoning79.4
Multimodal & GroundedUnavailable
Instruction FollowingUnavailable
MathUnavailable

Runtime service evidence

Measured values with the date they were observed. Nothing is inferred from a sibling model or a provider claim.

Time to first token: latency to the first answer chunk (Artificial Analysis, via BenchLM). Reasoning models include thinking time, so values can run to tens or hundreds of seconds.

Evidence key: Observed

Runtime measurements
MeasurementValueObservedLast goodEvidence
Time to first token213.23 s2026-09-172026-09-17
Throughput65 tok/s2026-09-172026-09-17

Regional or per-endpoint measurements appear only when the API supplies them; none are modelled here.

Endpoint and price matrix

Every published price component, including cache reads and writes.

Price components
ComponentUSDEvidence
Input / 1M tokens$10.00
Output / 1M tokens$50.00
Cache read / 1M tokens$0.25
Cache write / 1M tokensUnavailable
Blended / 1M (75% input / 25% output)$20.00
Self-hosted listingAnthropic's September 2026 launch page lists `claude-fable-5-1` at $10 input / $50 output per million tokens and cuts cache reads to $0.25 per million tokens. Anthropic estimates that lower cache-read rate reduces typical usage-based Fable workloads by about 25% and highly agentic workloads by as much as 45%; cache-write and Batch rates are not inferred from those estimates.The rates above are a hosted price matched from another provider, not a first-party list price.

Workload-aware monthly cost example

10 conversations per day × 8 messages × 22 active days, 1200 input and 400 output tokens per message, no cache. This uses the same calculator as the cost simulator, so an unavailable applicable rate makes the example unavailable too.

Modelled monthly cost$56.32
Modelled tokens2.82M
Open the simulatorChange this workload

Benchmark record

46 matched benchmark rows with their published value, unit, and provenance.

Knowledge

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkValueTasksDifficultyProvenance
HLE
Humanity's Last Exam
65Expert-level questionsFrontier expert levelHumanity's Last Exam
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
53.4Cross-benchmark intelligence indexDisplay-only external referenceArtificial Analysis
AA-GPQA Diamond
Artificial Analysis GPQA Diamond
93.7Graduate-level science questionsGraduate-level science reasoningArtificial Analysis GPQA Diamond Benchmark Leaderboard
AA-HLE
Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam
59.1Expert-level questionsFrontier expert reasoningArtificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam Benchmark Leaderboard
AA-Omniscience Index
Artificial Analysis Omniscience Index
43.5Knowledge questionsBroad factual knowledgeAA-Omniscience: Knowledge and Hallucination Benchmark
AA-Omniscience Accuracy
Artificial Analysis Omniscience Accuracy
67.2Knowledge questionsBroad knowledgeArtificial Analysis model benchmarks
AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate
Artificial Analysis Omniscience Hallucination Rate
72.6Knowledge questionsFactualityArtificial Analysis model benchmarks
HLE w/o tools
Humanity's Last Exam without tools
60.9Expert-level questionsFrontier expert levelIntroducing GPT-5.4 mini and nano
GPQA Diamond (Vals)
GPQA Diamond, Vals AI run
93.4Graduate-level science questionsExpert reasoningVals AI GPQA Diamond, Vals AI run leaderboard
MMLU-Pro (Vals)
MMLU-Pro, Vals AI run
92.4Academic multiple-choice questionsBroad academic knowledgeVals AI MMLU-Pro, Vals AI run leaderboard

Coding

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkValueTasksDifficultyProvenance
SWE-bench Pro
SWE-bench Pro
81.21,865 repository problemsLong-horizon professional engineeringSWE-Bench Pro: Can AI Agents Solve Long-Horizon Software Engineering Tasks?
SWE Multilingual
SWE Multilingual
89.1Multilingual software-engineering tasksProfessional software engineeringMiniMax M2.7: Early Echoes of Self-Evolution
SWE Multimodal
SWE-bench Multimodal
54.7Multimodal software engineering tasksFrontier multimodal codingSWE-bench Multimodal
ProgramBench
ProgramBench: Can Language Models Rebuild Programs From Scratch?
87.6200 program reconstruction tasksFull-repository software architectureProgramBench: Can Language Models Rebuild Programs From Scratch?
FrontierSWE v2
FrontierSWE v2
56.334 ultra-long-horizon engineering and research tasksUltra-long-horizon frontier software engineeringFrontierSWE v2
Bug Hunt Bench
Bug Hunt Bench
43105 planted bugs across two production TypeScript repositoriesBlind production-repository bug finding and repairBug Hunt Bench method, caveats, and definitions
AA Coding Index
Artificial Analysis Coding Index
81.6Cross-benchmark coding indexDisplay-only external referenceArtificial Analysis model leaderboards
AA-SciCode
Artificial Analysis SciCode
63.1Scientific coding subproblemsScientific programmingArtificial Analysis SciCode Benchmark Leaderboard
LiveCodeBench (Vals)
LiveCodeBench, Vals AI run
90.5Competitive programming problems (easy, medium, hard)Frontier codingVals AI LiveCodeBench, Vals AI run leaderboard
DeepSWE
DeepSWE
67.4113 software engineering tasks across 91 repositories and 5 languagesLong-horizon software engineeringDeepSWE benchmark blog

Reasoning

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkValueTasksDifficultyProvenance
ARC-AGI-1
ARC-AGI-1 Semi-Private Evaluation
97.50Semi-private ARC-AGI-1 evaluation setAbstract visual reasoningARC Prize leaderboard
ARC-AGI-2
Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus for AGI v2
90Visual pattern completion and abstract reasoningExpert-level — hardest public reasoning benchmarkARC-AGI-2: A Harder General Intelligence Benchmark
AA-LCR
Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning
85.3Long-context reasoning tasksLong-context reasoningArtificial Analysis model benchmarks
MLCR-AA
Medical Long Context Reasoning (MLCR-AA)
71.1Long, fragmented medical-record reasoningLong-context medical reasoningMedical Long Context Reasoning (MLCR-AA)
CritPt
Critical Physics Tasks
29.7Research-level physics questionsResearch-level physics reasoningCritPt Benchmark Leaderboard

Agentic

Agentic benchmarks
BenchmarkValueTasksDifficultyProvenance
Toolathlon Verified Pass@3
Toolathlon Verified Pass@3
81.5108 verified real-world tool-use tasksLong-horizon application tool useClaude Opus 5 System Card
Toolathlon Verified Pass³
Toolathlon Verified Pass cubed
73.1108 verified real-world tool-use tasksLong-horizon application tool useClaude Opus 5 System Card
Toolathlon Verified avg. turns
Toolathlon Verified average assistant turns
23.7108 verified real-world tool-use tasksLong-horizon application tool useClaude Opus 5 System Card
Terminal-Bench 4.0
Terminal-Bench 4.0
55.8066 professional computer-work tasksFrontier autonomous knowledge workTerminal-Bench 4.0
Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1
Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1
52.670 expert-curated scientific research workflowsFrontier scientific research workflowsTerminal-Bench-Science 0.1
AA Briefcase
Artificial Analysis Briefcase
1662Professional knowledge-work tasksProfessional workArtificial Analysis Briefcase Benchmark Leaderboard
AA AutomationBench
Artificial Analysis AutomationBench
59.4Business-process automation tasksAgentic automationArtificial Analysis AutomationBench Benchmark Leaderboard
AA Harvey LAB
Artificial Analysis Harvey LAB-AA
93.0Legal agent tasksProfessional legal workArtificial Analysis Harvey LAB-AA Benchmark Leaderboard
AA Tau3 Banking
Artificial Analysis Tau3-Banking
47.2Banking tool-use workflowsAgentic banking workflowsArtificial Analysis Tau3-Banking Benchmark Leaderboard
GDPval-AA
GDPval-AA
1764Agentic real-world work tasksProfessional agentic workflowsDeepSeek-V4 Technical Report
GDPval-AA
GDPval-AA normalized
63.2Economically valuable tasksProfessional agentic workflowsArtificial Analysis model benchmarks
AA Agentic Index
Artificial Analysis Agentic Index
58.0Cross-benchmark agentic indexDisplay-only external referenceArtificial Analysis model leaderboards
AA Terminal-Bench 4.0
Artificial Analysis Terminal-Bench v4.0
52.0Terminal-based agent tasksAgentic software engineeringArtificial Analysis Terminal-Bench v4.0 Benchmark Leaderboard
GDP.pdf
Artificial Analysis GDP.pdf
26.2Professional document-production tasksProfessional knowledge workGDP.pdf Benchmark Leaderboard
AA-AnalystAgent
Artificial Analysis AnalystAgent
57.5Spreadsheet and document analysis questionsBusiness and data analysisAA-AnalystAgent Benchmark Leaderboard
OSWorld 2.0
OSWorld 2.0
41.7108 long-horizon computer-use workflowsLong-horizon professional workflowsOSWorld2.0: Benchmarking Computer Use Agents on Long-Horizon Real-World Tasks
Toolathlon-Verified
Toolathlon-Verified
77.8Verified multi-tool workflowsAdvanced tool useKimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence
AutomationBench
AutomationBench
31.4600 public automation tasksLong-horizon automationKimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)
Terminal-Bench 2.1, Vals AI run
85.0Difficult terminal tasksFrontier agenticVals AI Terminal-Bench 2.1, Vals AI run leaderboard
ApprenticeBench
ApprenticeBench: end-to-end computer use, continual learning, and long-horizon agency on a real accounts-payable job
72100 vendor bills processed in sequence inside a simulated construction companyLong-horizon computer use with offline and online continual learningApprenticeBench: a step change in AI's job readiness

Multimodal & Grounded

Multimodal & Grounded benchmarks
BenchmarkValueTasksDifficultyProvenance
Design Arena Website
Design Arena Website Elo
1322Website generation comparisonsDesign and website generationOpenRouter Grok 4.3 benchmarks

Lifecycle and limitations log

Lifecycle events the source associates with this model, plus what this profile does not claim.

Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1Release · confirmed · announced Unavailable · effective 2026-09-01Anthropic
What this profile does not claimValues are reproduced exactly as their sources published them, in the units those sources declared; none are converted, interpolated, or averaged across providers. Any field marked unavailable was attempted and not returned — the attempt timestamp is in each badge. Last attempted fetch for this model’s score: 2026-09-17 17:17 UTC.