LLaDA2.2-mini
InclusionAI · Open Weight · bench-align-v5
Self-hostedCapability shape
Seven axes from the ranking source. A missing axis is drawn as a gap.
Runtime service evidence
Measured values with the date they were observed. Nothing is inferred from a sibling model or a provider claim.
Time to first token: latency to the first answer chunk (Artificial Analysis, via BenchLM). Reasoning models include thinking time, so values can run to tens or hundreds of seconds.
Evidence key: ObservedUnavailable
| Measurement | Value | Observed | Last good | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time to first token | Unavailable | Unavailable | Unavailable | |
| Throughput | Unavailable | Unavailable | Unavailable |
Regional or per-endpoint measurements appear only when the API supplies them; none are modelled here.
Endpoint and price matrix
Every published price component, including cache reads and writes.
Workload-aware monthly cost example
10 conversations per day × 8 messages × 22 active days, 1200 input and 400 output tokens per message, no cache. This uses the same calculator as the cost simulator, so an unavailable applicable rate makes the example unavailable too.
Benchmark record
9 matched benchmark rows with their published value, unit, and provenance.
Knowledge
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA-D GPQA Diamond | 44.4 | Graduate-level science questions | Graduate level | Trinity-Large-Thinking: Scaling an Open Source Frontier Agent |
Coding
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LiveCodeBench v6 LiveCodeBench v6 | 28.1 | Fresh programming problems | Competitive programming level | LiveCodeBench official repository and release documentation |
Mathematics
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIME26 AIME 2026 | 35.0 | Competition math problems | Olympiad-style mathematics | Qwen3.6 launch benchmarks |
Reasoning
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LongBench v2 LongBench v2 | 34.99 | Long-context tasks | Hard long-context | LongBench v2 |
Instruction Following
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench Instruction Following Benchmark | 24.93 | — | — | BenchLM |
Agentic
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench results τ²-Bench Tool-Agent-User Evaluation | 57.5 | Airline, retail, and telecom customer-service task sets | Dual-control customer-service workflows | τ²-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment |
| PinchBench PinchBench | 62.3 | 23 OpenClaw agent tasks | Long-horizon agent workflows | About PinchBench |
| BFCL v4 Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard v4 | 47.7 | Function-calling tasks | Advanced tool use | Trinity-Large-Thinking: Scaling an Open Source Frontier Agent |
| Claw-Eval Claw-Eval | 57.2 | 300 tasks, 2,159 rubrics | Real-world general, multi-turn, and native multimodal agent execution | Claw-Eval: Towards Trustworthy Evaluation of Autonomous Agents |
Lifecycle and limitations log
Lifecycle events the source associates with this model, plus what this profile does not claim.
That is not evidence the model has no lifecycle plan — only that this source published none.