MiMo-V2.5
Xiaomi · Proprietary · rank 67 · bench-align-v5
Capability shape
Seven axes from the ranking source. A missing axis is drawn as a gap.
Runtime service evidence
Measured values with the date they were observed. Nothing is inferred from a sibling model or a provider claim.
Time to first token: latency to the first answer chunk (Artificial Analysis, via BenchLM). Reasoning models include thinking time, so values can run to tens or hundreds of seconds.
Evidence key: Observed
| Measurement | Value | Observed | Last good | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time to first token | 51.62 s | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 | |
| Throughput | 45 tok/s | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
Regional or per-endpoint measurements appear only when the API supplies them; none are modelled here.
Endpoint and price matrix
Every published price component, including cache reads and writes.
Workload-aware monthly cost example
10 conversations per day × 8 messages × 22 active days, 1200 input and 400 output tokens per message, no cache. This uses the same calculator as the cost simulator, so an unavailable applicable rate makes the example unavailable too.
Benchmark record
16 matched benchmark rows with their published value, unit, and provenance.
Knowledge
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) GPQA Diamond, Vals AI run | 81.6 | Graduate-level science questions | Expert reasoning | Vals AI GPQA Diamond, Vals AI run leaderboard |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) MMLU-Pro, Vals AI run | 82.9 | Academic multiple-choice questions | Broad academic knowledge | Vals AI MMLU-Pro, Vals AI run leaderboard |
Coding
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 65.8 | Terminal-based software tasks | Professional software engineering | Terminal-Bench 2.0 |
| SWE-bench Pro SWE-bench Pro | 56.1 | 1,865 repository problems | Long-horizon professional engineering | SWE-Bench Pro: Can AI Agents Solve Long-Horizon Software Engineering Tasks? |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) LiveCodeBench, Vals AI run | 81.5 | Competitive programming problems (easy, medium, hard) | Frontier coding | Vals AI LiveCodeBench, Vals AI run leaderboard |
| SWE-bench (Vals) SWE-bench, Vals AI run | 71.0 | Real repository issues by human time bucket | Frontier coding agents | Vals AI SWE-bench, Vals AI run leaderboard |
Agentic
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 65.8 | Terminal-based software tasks | Professional software engineering | Terminal-Bench 2.0 |
| Gert Labs Gert Labs Composite Game Benchmark | 46.89 | Novel game environments | Agentic coding and decision-making | Gert Labs rankings |
| MM-ClawBench MM-ClawBench | 23.8 | OpenClaw-style real-world tasks | Broad real-world agentic execution | MiniMax M2.7: Early Echoes of Self-Evolution |
| Claw-Eval Claw-Eval | 62.3 | 300 tasks, 2,159 rubrics | Real-world general, multi-turn, and native multimodal agent execution | Claw-Eval: Towards Trustworthy Evaluation of Autonomous Agents |
| ResearchClawBench ResearchClawBench | 16.9 | 40 tasks across 10 scientific domains | Scientific research re-discovery | ResearchClawBench: A Benchmark for End-to-End Autonomous Scientific Research |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) Terminal-Bench 2.1, Vals AI run | 60.7 | Difficult terminal tasks | Frontier agentic | Vals AI Terminal-Bench 2.1, Vals AI run leaderboard |
Multimodal & Grounded
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMMU-Pro Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Pro | 77.9 | Multimodal academic reasoning | Frontier multimodal | MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmark |
| Design Arena Website Design Arena Website Elo | 1279 | Website generation comparisons | Design and website generation | OpenRouter Grok 4.3 benchmarks |
| Video-MME (with subtitle) Video-MME with subtitle | 87.7 | Video understanding | Multimodal video reasoning | Qwen3.6 launch benchmarks |
| CharXiv CharXiv Reasoning | 81 | Scientific chart reasoning | Scientific visualization reasoning | CharXiv: Charting Gaps in Realistic Chart Understanding in Multimodal LLMs |
Lifecycle and limitations log
Lifecycle events the source associates with this model, plus what this profile does not claim.
That is not evidence the model has no lifecycle plan — only that this source published none.