Skip to main content
ModelScale

North Mini Code

Cohere · Open Weight · bench-align-v5

Self-hosted
Compare this model Model a workload
Canonical idnorth-mini-code-1-0
Overall scoreUnavailable
Context window256K tokens
Release date2026-06-09
Access typeOpen Weight
Blended $/1MUnavailable75% input / 25% output

Capability shape

Seven axes from the ranking source. A missing axis is drawn as a gap.

Capability evidence

AgenticUnavailable
CodingUnavailable
KnowledgeUnavailable
ReasoningUnavailable
Multimodal & GroundedUnavailable
Instruction FollowingUnavailable
MathUnavailable

Runtime service evidence

Measured values with the date they were observed. Nothing is inferred from a sibling model or a provider claim.

Time to first token: latency to the first answer chunk (Artificial Analysis, via BenchLM). Reasoning models include thinking time, so values can run to tens or hundreds of seconds.

Evidence key: ObservedUnavailable

Runtime measurements
MeasurementValueObservedLast goodEvidence
Time to first token24.26 s2026-09-172026-09-17
Throughput84 tok/s2026-09-172026-09-17

Regional or per-endpoint measurements appear only when the API supplies them; none are modelled here.

Endpoint and price matrix

Every published price component, including cache reads and writes.

Price components
ComponentUSDEvidence
Input / 1M tokensUnavailable
Output / 1M tokensUnavailable
Cache read / 1M tokensUnavailable
Cache write / 1M tokensUnavailable
Blended / 1M (75% input / 25% output)Unavailable
Self-hosted listingCohere publishes North Mini Code under Apache-2.0 for self-hosting and does not publish a first-party hosted token rate for this exact checkpoint. We represent the open-weight row as self-host/free-per-token before infrastructure costs.No hosted token rate was published for this model, so its per-token price is unavailable rather than zero.

Workload-aware monthly cost example

10 conversations per day × 8 messages × 22 active days, 1200 input and 400 output tokens per message, no cache. This uses the same calculator as the cost simulator, so an unavailable applicable rate makes the example unavailable too.

Modelled monthly costUnavailableThe applicable input rate is unavailable.
Modelled tokensUnavailable
Open the simulatorChange this workload

Benchmark record

12 matched benchmark rows with their published value, unit, and provenance.

Knowledge

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkValueTasksDifficultyProvenance
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
12.8Cross-benchmark intelligence indexDisplay-only external referenceArtificial Analysis
AA-GPQA Diamond
Artificial Analysis GPQA Diamond
75.7Graduate-level science questionsGraduate-level science reasoningArtificial Analysis GPQA Diamond Benchmark Leaderboard
AA-HLE
Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam
11.1Expert-level questionsFrontier expert reasoningArtificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam Benchmark Leaderboard
AA-Omniscience Index
Artificial Analysis Omniscience Index
-48.6Knowledge questionsBroad factual knowledgeAA-Omniscience: Knowledge and Hallucination Benchmark
AA-Omniscience Accuracy
Artificial Analysis Omniscience Accuracy
18.9Knowledge questionsBroad knowledgeArtificial Analysis model benchmarks
AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate
Artificial Analysis Omniscience Hallucination Rate
83.2Knowledge questionsFactualityArtificial Analysis model benchmarks

Coding

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkValueTasksDifficultyProvenance
AA-SciCode
Artificial Analysis SciCode
38.8Scientific coding subproblemsScientific programmingArtificial Analysis SciCode Benchmark Leaderboard

Reasoning

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkValueTasksDifficultyProvenance
AA-LCR
Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning
37.3Long-context reasoning tasksLong-context reasoningArtificial Analysis model benchmarks
CritPt
Critical Physics Tasks
0.3Research-level physics questionsResearch-level physics reasoningCritPt Benchmark Leaderboard

Instruction Following

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkValueTasksDifficultyProvenance
AA-IFBench
Artificial Analysis IFBench
57.6Verifiable instruction constraintsInstruction precisionArtificial Analysis IFBench Benchmark Leaderboard

Agentic

Agentic benchmarks
BenchmarkValueTasksDifficultyProvenance
GDPval-AA
GDPval-AA normalized
0.0Economically valuable tasksProfessional agentic workflowsArtificial Analysis model benchmarks
τ²-bench results
τ²-Bench Tool-Agent-User Evaluation
37.4Airline, retail, and telecom customer-service task setsDual-control customer-service workflowsτ²-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment

Lifecycle and limitations log

Lifecycle events the source associates with this model, plus what this profile does not claim.

No lifecycle event references this model.

That is not evidence the model has no lifecycle plan — only that this source published none.

What this profile does not claimValues are reproduced exactly as their sources published them, in the units those sources declared; none are converted, interpolated, or averaged across providers. Any field marked unavailable was attempted and not returned — the attempt timestamp is in each badge. Last attempted fetch for this model’s score: 2026-09-17 17:17 UTC.