Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Alibaba · Open Weight · rank 113 · bench-align-v5
Self-hostedCanonical idqwen3-5-122b-a10b
Access typeOpen Weight
Blended $/1MUnavailable75% input / 25% output
Capability shape
Seven axes from the ranking source. A missing axis is drawn as a gap.
Runtime service evidence
Measured values with the date they were observed. Nothing is inferred from a sibling model or a provider claim.
Time to first token: latency to the first answer chunk (Artificial Analysis, via BenchLM). Reasoning models include thinking time, so values can run to tens or hundreds of seconds.
Evidence key: Observed
| Measurement | Value | Observed | Last good | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time to first token | 18.04 s | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 | |
| Throughput | 127 tok/s | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
Regional or per-endpoint measurements appear only when the API supplies them; none are modelled here.
Endpoint and price matrix
Every published price component, including cache reads and writes.
Self-hosted listingOpen-weight model. Self-hosted or third-party hosted costs vary by provider and infrastructure.No hosted token rate was published for this model, so its per-token price is unavailable rather than zero.
Workload-aware monthly cost example
10 conversations per day × 8 messages × 22 active days, 1200 input and 400 output tokens per message, no cache. This uses the same calculator as the cost simulator, so an unavailable applicable rate makes the example unavailable too.
Modelled monthly costUnavailableThe applicable input rate is unavailable.
Modelled tokensUnavailable
Open the simulatorChange this workload
Benchmark record
31 matched benchmark rows with their published value, unit, and provenance.
Knowledge
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A | 86.6 | 448 questions | Graduate level | GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark |
| SuperGPQA SuperGPQA: Scaling LLM Evaluation Across 285 Graduate Disciplines | 67.1 | 285 disciplines | Graduate level | SuperGPQA: Scaling LLM Evaluation Across 285 Graduate Disciplines |
| MMLU-Pro Massive Multitask Language Understanding Professional | 86.7 | Multiple subjects | Professional level | MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index | 16.2 | Cross-benchmark intelligence index | Display-only external reference | Artificial Analysis |
| AA-GPQA Diamond Artificial Analysis GPQA Diamond | 85.7 | Graduate-level science questions | Graduate-level science reasoning | Artificial Analysis GPQA Diamond Benchmark Leaderboard |
| AA-HLE Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam | 25.2 | Expert-level questions | Frontier expert reasoning | Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam Benchmark Leaderboard |
| AA-Omniscience Index Artificial Analysis Omniscience Index | -41.5 | Knowledge questions | Broad factual knowledge | AA-Omniscience: Knowledge and Hallucination Benchmark |
| AA-Omniscience Accuracy Artificial Analysis Omniscience Accuracy | 24.4 | Knowledge questions | Broad knowledge | Artificial Analysis model benchmarks |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate Artificial Analysis Omniscience Hallucination Rate | 87.1 | Knowledge questions | Factuality | Artificial Analysis model benchmarks |
Coding
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified Software Engineering Benchmark Verified | 72 | 500 verified issues | Professional software engineering | SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues? |
| AA Coding Index Artificial Analysis Coding Index | 45.7 | Cross-benchmark coding index | Display-only external reference | Artificial Analysis model leaderboards |
| AA-SciCode Artificial Analysis SciCode | 39.7 | Scientific coding subproblems | Scientific programming | Artificial Analysis SciCode Benchmark Leaderboard |
Reasoning
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LongBench v2 LongBench v2 | 60.2 | Long-context tasks | Hard long-context | LongBench v2 |
| AA-LCR Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning | 76.3 | Long-context reasoning tasks | Long-context reasoning | Artificial Analysis model benchmarks |
| CritPt Critical Physics Tasks | 0.6 | Research-level physics questions | Research-level physics reasoning | CritPt Benchmark Leaderboard |
Instruction Following
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFEval Instruction-Following Eval | 93.4 | 541 prompts across 25 instruction types | Instruction precision | Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Models |
| AA-IFBench Artificial Analysis IFBench | 75.7 | Verifiable instruction constraints | Instruction precision | Artificial Analysis IFBench Benchmark Leaderboard |
Multilingual
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProX MMLU-ProX | 82.2 | Multilingual professional QA | Professional multilingual | MMLU-ProX: A Multilingual Benchmark for Advanced Large Language Model Evaluation |
Agentic
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 49.4 | Terminal-based software tasks | Professional software engineering | Terminal-Bench 2.0 |
| BrowseComp BrowseComp | 63.8 | Research questions requiring browsing | Hard web research | BrowseComp |
| GDPval-AA GDPval-AA | 925 | Agentic real-world work tasks | Professional agentic workflows | DeepSeek-V4 Technical Report |
| GDPval-AA GDPval-AA normalized | 21.3 | Economically valuable tasks | Professional agentic workflows | Artificial Analysis model benchmarks |
| AA Agentic Index Artificial Analysis Agentic Index | 9.6 | Cross-benchmark agentic index | Display-only external reference | Artificial Analysis model leaderboards |
| OSWorld-Verified OSWorld-Verified | 58 | 369 real-world computer tasks (361 when eight Google Drive tasks are excluded) | Multi-step desktop and cross-application workflows | OSWorld |
| τ²-bench results τ²-Bench Tool-Agent-User Evaluation | 93.6 | Airline, retail, and telecom customer-service task sets | Dual-control customer-service workflows | τ²-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment |
Multimodal & Grounded
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMMU Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding | 83.9 | Multimodal academic reasoning | Frontier multimodal | MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI |
| AA-MMMU-Pro Artificial Analysis MMMU-Pro | 75.0 | Multimodal academic reasoning | Frontier multimodal | Artificial Analysis MMMU-Pro Benchmark Leaderboard |
| MathVision MathVision | 86.2 | Visually grounded math problems | Advanced multimodal mathematics | Qwen3.6 launch benchmarks |
| MMVU Multimodal Multi-disciplinary Video Understanding | 74.7 | Video understanding | Multi-disciplinary multimodal video reasoning | Kimi K2.5 benchmark release surface |
| V* V* | 93.2 | Frontier multimodal reasoning tasks | Frontier multimodal | GLM-5V-Turbo |
| CharXiv CharXiv Reasoning | 77.2 | Scientific chart reasoning | Scientific visualization reasoning | CharXiv: Charting Gaps in Realistic Chart Understanding in Multimodal LLMs |
Lifecycle and limitations log
Lifecycle events the source associates with this model, plus what this profile does not claim.
No lifecycle event references this model.
That is not evidence the model has no lifecycle plan — only that this source published none.
What this profile does not claimValues are reproduced exactly as their sources published them, in the units those sources declared; none are converted, interpolated, or averaged across providers. Any field marked unavailable was attempted and not returned — the attempt timestamp is in each badge. Last attempted fetch for this model’s score: 2026-09-17 18:17 UTC.