Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Alibaba · Open Weight · rank 148 · bench-align-v5
Canonical idqwen3-6-35b-a3b
Access typeOpen Weight
Blended $/1MUnavailable75% input / 25% output
Capability shape
Seven axes from the ranking source. A missing axis is drawn as a gap.
Runtime service evidence
Measured values with the date they were observed. Nothing is inferred from a sibling model or a provider claim.
Time to first token: latency to the first answer chunk (Artificial Analysis, via BenchLM). Reasoning models include thinking time, so values can run to tens or hundreds of seconds.
Evidence key: Observed
| Measurement | Value | Observed | Last good | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time to first token | 45.95 s | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 | |
| Throughput | 123 tok/s | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
Regional or per-endpoint measurements appear only when the API supplies them; none are modelled here.
Endpoint and price matrix
Every published price component, including cache reads and writes.
Workload-aware monthly cost example
10 conversations per day × 8 messages × 22 active days, 1200 input and 400 output tokens per message, no cache. This uses the same calculator as the cost simulator, so an unavailable applicable rate makes the example unavailable too.
Modelled monthly costUnavailableThe applicable input rate is unavailable.
Modelled tokensUnavailable
Open the simulatorChange this workload
Benchmark record
57 matched benchmark rows with their published value, unit, and provenance.
Knowledge
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A | 86 | 448 questions | Graduate level | GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark |
| SuperGPQA SuperGPQA: Scaling LLM Evaluation Across 285 Graduate Disciplines | 64.7 | 285 disciplines | Graduate level | SuperGPQA: Scaling LLM Evaluation Across 285 Graduate Disciplines |
| MMLU-Pro Massive Multitask Language Understanding Professional | 85.2 | Multiple subjects | Professional level | MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark |
| HLE Humanity's Last Exam | 21.4 | Expert-level questions | Frontier expert level | Humanity's Last Exam |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index | 18.8 | Cross-benchmark intelligence index | Display-only external reference | Artificial Analysis |
| AA-GPQA Diamond Artificial Analysis GPQA Diamond | 84.1 | Graduate-level science questions | Graduate-level science reasoning | Artificial Analysis GPQA Diamond Benchmark Leaderboard |
| AA-HLE Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam | 22.2 | Expert-level questions | Frontier expert reasoning | Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam Benchmark Leaderboard |
| AA-Omniscience Index Artificial Analysis Omniscience Index | -22.2 | Knowledge questions | Broad factual knowledge | AA-Omniscience: Knowledge and Hallucination Benchmark |
| AA-Omniscience Accuracy Artificial Analysis Omniscience Accuracy | 18.8 | Knowledge questions | Broad knowledge | Artificial Analysis model benchmarks |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate Artificial Analysis Omniscience Hallucination Rate | 50.5 | Knowledge questions | Factuality | Artificial Analysis model benchmarks |
| C-Eval C-Eval | 90 | Chinese academic and professional exams | High school to professional level | C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Models |
Coding
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 51.5 | Terminal-based software tasks | Professional software engineering | Terminal-Bench 2.0 |
| SWE-bench Verified Software Engineering Benchmark Verified | 73.4 | 500 verified issues | Professional software engineering | SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues? |
| LiveCodeBench LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code | 80.4 | Continuously updated contest problems | Competitive programming level | LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code |
| SWE-bench Pro SWE-bench Pro | 49.5 | 1,865 repository problems | Long-horizon professional engineering | SWE-Bench Pro: Can AI Agents Solve Long-Horizon Software Engineering Tasks? |
| SWE Multilingual SWE Multilingual | 67.2 | Multilingual software-engineering tasks | Professional software engineering | MiniMax M2.7: Early Echoes of Self-Evolution |
| NL2Repo NL2Repo | 29.4 | Natural language to repository tasks | System-level software comprehension | MiniMax M2.7: Early Echoes of Self-Evolution |
| AA Coding Index Artificial Analysis Coding Index | 41.9 | Cross-benchmark coding index | Display-only external reference | Artificial Analysis model leaderboards |
| AA-SciCode Artificial Analysis SciCode | 36.6 | Scientific coding subproblems | Scientific programming | Artificial Analysis SciCode Benchmark Leaderboard |
Mathematics
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIME26 AIME 2026 | 92.7 | Competition math problems | Olympiad-style mathematics | Qwen3.6 launch benchmarks |
| HMMT Feb 2025 Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament February 2025 | 90.7 | Competition math problems | Olympiad-style mathematics | Qwen3.6 launch benchmarks |
| HMMT Nov 2025 Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament November 2025 | 89.1 | Competition math problems | Olympiad-style mathematics | Qwen3.6 launch benchmarks |
| HMMT Feb 2026 Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament February 2026 | 83.6 | Competition math problems | Olympiad-style mathematics | Qwen3.6 launch benchmarks |
| MMAnswerBench MMAnswerBench | 78.9 | Multimodal math questions | Advanced mathematical reasoning | Qwen3.6 launch benchmarks |
Reasoning
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-LCR Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning | 71.7 | Long-context reasoning tasks | Long-context reasoning | Artificial Analysis model benchmarks |
| CritPt Critical Physics Tasks | 0.3 | Research-level physics questions | Research-level physics reasoning | CritPt Benchmark Leaderboard |
Instruction Following
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBench Artificial Analysis IFBench | 64.4 | Verifiable instruction constraints | Instruction precision | Artificial Analysis IFBench Benchmark Leaderboard |
Agentic
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 51.5 | Terminal-based software tasks | Professional software engineering | Terminal-Bench 2.0 |
| GDPval-AA GDPval-AA | 992 | Agentic real-world work tasks | Professional agentic workflows | DeepSeek-V4 Technical Report |
| GDPval-AA GDPval-AA normalized | 24.5 | Economically valuable tasks | Professional agentic workflows | Artificial Analysis model benchmarks |
| AA Agentic Index Artificial Analysis Agentic Index | 15.0 | Cross-benchmark agentic index | Display-only external reference | Artificial Analysis model leaderboards |
| Gert Labs Gert Labs Composite Game Benchmark | 42.65 | Novel game environments | Agentic coding and decision-making | Gert Labs rankings |
| MCP Atlas MCP Atlas | 62.8 | Tool-integrated agent tasks | Advanced tool use | Introducing GPT-5.4 mini and nano |
| Toolathlon Toolathlon | 26.9 | Multi-tool workflows | Advanced tool use | Introducing GPT-5.4 mini and nano |
| τ²-bench results τ²-Bench Tool-Agent-User Evaluation | 95.3 | Airline, retail, and telecom customer-service task sets | Dual-control customer-service workflows | τ²-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment |
| Claw-Eval Claw-Eval | 68.7 | 300 tasks, 2,159 rubrics | Real-world general, multi-turn, and native multimodal agent execution | Claw-Eval: Towards Trustworthy Evaluation of Autonomous Agents |
| QwenClawBench QwenClawBench | 52.6 | Real-world agent workflows | Broad real-world agentic execution | Qwen3.6 launch benchmarks |
| QwenWebBench QwenWebBench | 1397 | Web artifacts and interactive deliverables | Artifact generation | Qwen3.6 launch benchmarks |
| τ³-bench results τ³-Bench Tool-Agent-User Evaluation | 67.2 | Corrected customer-service tasks plus knowledge and voice evaluation modes | Long-horizon, multimodal, and knowledge-aware tool use | Official τ³-bench repository and release notes |
| VITA-Bench VITA-Bench | 35.6 | Interactive consumer-service agent tasks | Long-horizon real-world workflows | VitaBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents with Versatile Interactive Tasks in Real-world Applications |
| DeepPlanning DeepPlanning | 25.9 | Travel planning and constrained shopping | Constrained agent planning | DeepPlanning: Benchmarking Long-Horizon Agentic Planning with Verifiable Constraints |
| WideResearch WideResearch | 60.1 | Open-ended research tasks | Broad research-agent workflows | Qwen3.6 launch benchmarks |
Multimodal & Grounded
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMMU Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding | 81.7 | Multimodal academic reasoning | Frontier multimodal | MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI |
| MMMU-Pro Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Pro | 75.3 | Multimodal academic reasoning | Frontier multimodal | MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmark |
| AA-MMMU-Pro Artificial Analysis MMMU-Pro | 75.0 | Multimodal academic reasoning | Frontier multimodal | Artificial Analysis MMMU-Pro Benchmark Leaderboard |
| OmniDocBench 1.5 OmniDocBench 1.5 | 89.9 | Document understanding tasks | Grounded document reasoning | Introducing GPT-5.4 mini and nano |
| RealWorldQA RealWorldQA | 85.3 | Real-world visual question answering | General visual reasoning | Qwen3.6 launch benchmarks |
| Video-MME (with subtitle) Video-MME with subtitle | 86.6 | Video understanding | Multimodal video reasoning | Qwen3.6 launch benchmarks |
| Video-MME (w/o subtitle) Video-MME without subtitle | 82.5 | Video understanding | Multimodal video reasoning | Qwen3.6 launch benchmarks |
| CC-OCR CC-OCR | 81.9 | Optical character recognition | Document reading | Qwen3.6 launch benchmarks |
| AI2D_TEST AI2D test split | 92.7 | Diagram understanding | Structured visual reasoning | Qwen3.6 launch benchmarks |
| RefCOCO (avg) RefCOCO average | 92.0 | Referring-expression grounding | Fine-grained visual grounding | RefCOCO referring expression datasets |
| ODINW13 ODINW13 | 50.8 | Out-of-distribution object understanding | Robust visual grounding | Qwen3.6 launch benchmarks |
| VideoMMMU VideoMMMU | 83.7 | Video-grounded expert reasoning | Frontier multimodal video reasoning | Qwen3.6 launch benchmarks |
| MLVU (M-Avg) MLVU mean average | 86.2 | General video understanding | Broad multimodal video reasoning | Qwen3.6 launch benchmarks |
| SimpleVQA SimpleVQA | 58.9 | Visual QA tasks | General visual understanding | GLM-5V-Turbo |
| CharXiv CharXiv Reasoning | 78 | Scientific chart reasoning | Scientific visualization reasoning | CharXiv: Charting Gaps in Realistic Chart Understanding in Multimodal LLMs |
Lifecycle and limitations log
Lifecycle events the source associates with this model, plus what this profile does not claim.
No lifecycle event references this model.
That is not evidence the model has no lifecycle plan — only that this source published none.
What this profile does not claimValues are reproduced exactly as their sources published them, in the units those sources declared; none are converted, interpolated, or averaged across providers. Any field marked unavailable was attempted and not returned — the attempt timestamp is in each badge. Last attempted fetch for this model’s score: 2026-09-17 17:17 UTC.