Skip to main content
ModelScale

Qwen3.7 Plus

Alibaba · Proprietary · rank 50 · bench-align-v5

Canonical idqwen3-7-plus
Overall score61.78
Context window1M tokens
Release date2026-06-03
Access typeProprietary
Blended $/1MUnavailable75% input / 25% output

Capability shape

Seven axes from the ranking source. A missing axis is drawn as a gap.

Capability evidence

Agentic58.1
Coding57.9
Knowledge59.3
Reasoning74
Multimodal & Grounded72.5
Instruction Following91.1
Math78.3

Runtime service evidence

Measured values with the date they were observed. Nothing is inferred from a sibling model or a provider claim.

Time to first token: latency to the first answer chunk (Artificial Analysis, via BenchLM). Reasoning models include thinking time, so values can run to tens or hundreds of seconds.

Evidence key: Observed

Runtime measurements
MeasurementValueObservedLast goodEvidence
Time to first token30.66 s2026-09-172026-09-17
Throughput70 tok/s2026-09-172026-09-17

Regional or per-endpoint measurements appear only when the API supplies them; none are modelled here.

Endpoint and price matrix

Every published price component, including cache reads and writes.

Price components
ComponentUSDEvidence
Input / 1M tokensUnavailable
Output / 1M tokensUnavailable
Cache read / 1M tokensUnavailable
Cache write / 1M tokensUnavailable
Blended / 1M (75% input / 25% output)Unavailable

Workload-aware monthly cost example

10 conversations per day × 8 messages × 22 active days, 1200 input and 400 output tokens per message, no cache. This uses the same calculator as the cost simulator, so an unavailable applicable rate makes the example unavailable too.

Modelled monthly costUnavailableThe applicable input rate is unavailable.
Modelled tokensUnavailable
Open the simulatorChange this workload

Benchmark record

70 matched benchmark rows with their published value, unit, and provenance.

Knowledge

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkValueTasksDifficultyProvenance
GPQA
Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A
90.3448 questionsGraduate levelGPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark
GPQA-D
GPQA Diamond
90.3Graduate-level science questionsGraduate levelTrinity-Large-Thinking: Scaling an Open Source Frontier Agent
SuperGPQA
SuperGPQA: Scaling LLM Evaluation Across 285 Graduate Disciplines
71.4285 disciplinesGraduate levelSuperGPQA: Scaling LLM Evaluation Across 285 Graduate Disciplines
MMLU-Pro
Massive Multitask Language Understanding Professional
88.5Multiple subjectsProfessional levelMMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark
HLE
Humanity's Last Exam
34.7Expert-level questionsFrontier expert levelHumanity's Last Exam
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
25.8Cross-benchmark intelligence indexDisplay-only external referenceArtificial Analysis
AA-GPQA Diamond
Artificial Analysis GPQA Diamond
90.0Graduate-level science questionsGraduate-level science reasoningArtificial Analysis GPQA Diamond Benchmark Leaderboard
AA-HLE
Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam
35.6Expert-level questionsFrontier expert reasoningArtificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam Benchmark Leaderboard
AA-Omniscience Index
Artificial Analysis Omniscience Index
1.1Knowledge questionsBroad factual knowledgeAA-Omniscience: Knowledge and Hallucination Benchmark
AA-Omniscience Accuracy
Artificial Analysis Omniscience Accuracy
22.5Knowledge questionsBroad knowledgeArtificial Analysis model benchmarks
AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate
Artificial Analysis Omniscience Hallucination Rate
27.7Knowledge questionsFactualityArtificial Analysis model benchmarks
MMLU-Redux
MMLU-Redux
94.5Broad academic QAAdvanced general knowledgeQwen3.6 launch benchmarks
MMMLU
MMMLU
89.0Multilingual academic QABroad multilingual knowledgeMMMLU

Coding

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkValueTasksDifficultyProvenance
Terminal-Bench 2.0
Terminal-Bench 2.0
70.3Terminal-based software tasksProfessional software engineeringTerminal-Bench 2.0
SWE-bench Verified
Software Engineering Benchmark Verified
77.7500 verified issuesProfessional software engineeringSWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?
LiveCodeBench
LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code
89.6Continuously updated contest problemsCompetitive programming levelLiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code
SWE-bench Pro
SWE-bench Pro
57.61,865 repository problemsLong-horizon professional engineeringSWE-Bench Pro: Can AI Agents Solve Long-Horizon Software Engineering Tasks?
SWE Multilingual
SWE Multilingual
75.8Multilingual software-engineering tasksProfessional software engineeringMiniMax M2.7: Early Echoes of Self-Evolution
NL2Repo
NL2Repo
41.1Natural language to repository tasksSystem-level software comprehensionMiniMax M2.7: Early Echoes of Self-Evolution
SciCode
Scientific Code Benchmark
51.3BenchLM
AA Coding Index
Artificial Analysis Coding Index
55.9Cross-benchmark coding indexDisplay-only external referenceArtificial Analysis model leaderboards
AA-SciCode
Artificial Analysis SciCode
46.1Scientific coding subproblemsScientific programmingArtificial Analysis SciCode Benchmark Leaderboard

Mathematics

Mathematics benchmarks
BenchmarkValueTasksDifficultyProvenance
HMMT Feb 2026
Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament February 2026
92.9Competition math problemsOlympiad-style mathematicsQwen3.6 launch benchmarks
IMOAnswerBench
IMOAnswerBench
86.0Advanced mathematical answer generationOlympiad-level mathematicsDeepSeek-V4 Technical Report
Apex
Apex
22.7Advanced mathematical reasoningFrontier math reasoningDeepSeek-V4 Technical Report

Reasoning

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkValueTasksDifficultyProvenance
MRCRv2
MRCRv2
91.7Long-context retrievalHard long-contextIntroducing GPT-5.2 and GPT-5.2 Pro
AA-LCR
Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning
73.0Long-context reasoning tasksLong-context reasoningArtificial Analysis model benchmarks
CritPt
Critical Physics Tasks
9.1Research-level physics questionsResearch-level physics reasoningCritPt Benchmark Leaderboard

Instruction Following

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkValueTasksDifficultyProvenance
IFEval
Instruction-Following Eval
94.6541 prompts across 25 instruction typesInstruction precisionInstruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Models
IFBench
Instruction Following Benchmark
79.1BenchLM
AA-IFBench
Artificial Analysis IFBench
78.0Verifiable instruction constraintsInstruction precisionArtificial Analysis IFBench Benchmark Leaderboard

Multilingual

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkValueTasksDifficultyProvenance
MMLU-ProX
MMLU-ProX
85.4Multilingual professional QAProfessional multilingualMMLU-ProX: A Multilingual Benchmark for Advanced Large Language Model Evaluation
NOVA-63
NOVA-63
58.8Broad multilingual evaluationBroad multilingual capabilityQwen3.6 launch benchmarks
INCLUDE
INCLUDE
83.0Cross-lingual understandingBroad multilingual capabilityQwen3.6 launch benchmarks
PolyMath
PolyMath
84.0Multilingual math problemsAdvanced multilingual reasoningQwen3.6 launch benchmarks
MAXIFE
MAXIFE
88.8Multilingual instruction followingAdvanced multilingual instruction followingQwen3.6 launch benchmarks

Agentic

Agentic benchmarks
BenchmarkValueTasksDifficultyProvenance
Terminal-Bench 2.0
Terminal-Bench 2.0
70.3Terminal-based software tasksProfessional software engineeringTerminal-Bench 2.0
GDPval-AA
GDPval-AA
886Agentic real-world work tasksProfessional agentic workflowsDeepSeek-V4 Technical Report
GDPval-AA
GDPval-AA normalized
19.3Economically valuable tasksProfessional agentic workflowsArtificial Analysis model benchmarks
AA Agentic Index
Artificial Analysis Agentic Index
19.7Cross-benchmark agentic indexDisplay-only external referenceArtificial Analysis model leaderboards
APEX-Agents-AA
APEX-Agents-AA
22.4452 professional-services agent tasksLong-horizon workplace agent tasksAPEX-Agents-AA Benchmark Leaderboard
OSWorld-Verified
OSWorld-Verified
73.3369 real-world computer tasks (361 when eight Google Drive tasks are excluded)Multi-step desktop and cross-application workflowsOSWorld
OSWorld 2.0
OSWorld 2.0
2.8108 long-horizon computer-use workflowsLong-horizon professional workflowsOSWorld2.0: Benchmarking Computer Use Agents on Long-Horizon Real-World Tasks
AndroidWorld
AndroidWorld
81.0Android app workflowsComplex mobile task completionGLM-5V-Turbo
MCP Atlas
MCP Atlas
73.2Tool-integrated agent tasksAdvanced tool useIntroducing GPT-5.4 mini and nano
τ²-bench results
τ²-Bench Tool-Agent-User Evaluation
93Airline, retail, and telecom customer-service task setsDual-control customer-service workflowsτ²-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment
BFCL v4
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard v4
72.9Function-calling tasksAdvanced tool useTrinity-Large-Thinking: Scaling an Open Source Frontier Agent
Claw-Eval
Claw-Eval
62.7300 tasks, 2,159 rubricsReal-world general, multi-turn, and native multimodal agent executionClaw-Eval: Towards Trustworthy Evaluation of Autonomous Agents
QwenClawBench
QwenClawBench
61.8Real-world agent workflowsBroad real-world agentic executionQwen3.6 launch benchmarks
QwenWebBench
QwenWebBench
1536Web artifacts and interactive deliverablesArtifact generationQwen3.6 launch benchmarks
VITA-Bench
VITA-Bench
45.6Interactive consumer-service agent tasksLong-horizon real-world workflowsVitaBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents with Versatile Interactive Tasks in Real-world Applications
DeepPlanning
DeepPlanning
62.3Travel planning and constrained shoppingConstrained agent planningDeepPlanning: Benchmarking Long-Horizon Agentic Planning with Verifiable Constraints
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)
Terminal-Bench 2.1, Vals AI run
52.8Difficult terminal tasksFrontier agenticVals AI Terminal-Bench 2.1, Vals AI run leaderboard

Multimodal & Grounded

Multimodal & Grounded benchmarks
BenchmarkValueTasksDifficultyProvenance
MMMU-Pro
Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Pro
79Multimodal academic reasoningFrontier multimodalMMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmark
AA-MMMU-Pro
Artificial Analysis MMMU-Pro
80.5Multimodal academic reasoningFrontier multimodalArtificial Analysis MMMU-Pro Benchmark Leaderboard
OCRBench V2
OCRBench V2
70.7Image OCR tasksNative visual text understandingOCRBench v2: An Improved Benchmark for Evaluating Large Multimodal Models on Visual Text Localization and Reasoning
Design Arena Website
Design Arena Website Elo
1281Website generation comparisonsDesign and website generationOpenRouter Grok 4.3 benchmarks
OmniDocBench 1.5
OmniDocBench 1.5
91.4Document understanding tasksGrounded document reasoningIntroducing GPT-5.4 mini and nano
RealWorldQA
RealWorldQA
86.9Real-world visual question answeringGeneral visual reasoningQwen3.6 launch benchmarks
Video-MME (with subtitle)
Video-MME with subtitle
88.0Video understandingMultimodal video reasoningQwen3.6 launch benchmarks
MathVision
MathVision
90.3Visually grounded math problemsAdvanced multimodal mathematicsQwen3.6 launch benchmarks
ODINW13
ODINW13
51.1Out-of-distribution object understandingRobust visual groundingQwen3.6 launch benchmarks
ERQA
ERQA
69.8Evidence-based visual QAGrounded multimodal reasoningQwen3.6 launch benchmarks
VideoMMMU
VideoMMMU
85.4Video-grounded expert reasoningFrontier multimodal video reasoningQwen3.6 launch benchmarks
MLVU (M-Avg)
MLVU mean average
87.4General video understandingBroad multimodal video reasoningQwen3.6 launch benchmarks
ScreenSpot Pro
ScreenSpot Pro
79.01,581 grounding instructionsProfessional GUI groundingScreenSpot-Pro: GUI Grounding for Professional High-Resolution Computer Use
MedXpertQA (MM)
MedXpertQA Multimodal
71.02,000 multimodal medical questionsClinical multimodal reasoningMuse Spark Eval Methodology
MMSearch-Plus
MMSearch-Plus
41.4Hard multimodal search tasksAdvanced multimodal searchGLM-5V-Turbo
SimpleVQA
SimpleVQA
81.7Visual QA tasksGeneral visual understandingGLM-5V-Turbo
CharXiv
CharXiv Reasoning
85.9Scientific chart reasoningScientific visualization reasoningCharXiv: Charting Gaps in Realistic Chart Understanding in Multimodal LLMs

Lifecycle and limitations log

Lifecycle events the source associates with this model, plus what this profile does not claim.

No lifecycle event references this model.

That is not evidence the model has no lifecycle plan — only that this source published none.

What this profile does not claimValues are reproduced exactly as their sources published them, in the units those sources declared; none are converted, interpolated, or averaged across providers. Any field marked unavailable was attempted and not returned — the attempt timestamp is in each badge. Last attempted fetch for this model’s score: 2026-09-17 17:17 UTC.