Loading page…
Preferred languages
More languages supported by Google Translate
Open the selector to load the current language catalog.
Translations are provided by Google Translate.
Loading page…
Preferred languages
More languages supported by Google Translate
Open the selector to load the current language catalog.
Translations are provided by Google Translate.
external benchmark
Every model the catalog carries a published Circa value for, ranked by that value.
Circa pairs polar questions with indirect answers and labels how each answer should be interpreted. It tests conversational decisions where the response does not simply say yes or no.
The benchmark is defined by “I’d rather just go to bed”: Understanding Indirect Answers, but the catalog carries no value for it yet. An absent value is shown as absent here rather than as a zero.
What the benchmark measures and how its value is published, from the source’s own record.
Circa is an external benchmark published by “I’d rather just go to bed”: Understanding Indirect Answers. Circa pairs polar questions with indirect answers and labels how each answer should be interpreted. It tests conversational decisions where the response does not simply say yes or no. Its evaluation set is described by the source as interpreting indirect answers to yes/no questions. The source rates its difficulty as depends on the evaluated split and label mapping.
Each model's result is published by “I’d rather just go to bed”: Understanding Indirect Answers as decision classification. ModelScale prints that value exactly as published, and never converts or rescales it. This page ranks the 0 models that carry a published value, highest value first; a model the source never scored is left out rather than ranked at zero. The source does not state whether a higher value is the better result, so neither does this page.