Loading page…
Preferred languages
More languages supported by Google Translate
Open the selector to load the current language catalog.
Translations are provided by Google Translate.
Loading page…
Preferred languages
More languages supported by Google Translate
Open the selector to load the current language catalog.
Translations are provided by Google Translate.
external benchmark
Every model the catalog carries a published ViDoRe V3 Image (Perplexity report) value for, ranked by that value.
Perplexity reports public ViDoRe V3 image retrieval nDCG@10 of 62.3 for the 0.6B model and 65.2 for the 9B model.
2 models with a published ViDoRe V3 Image (Perplexity report) value, ordered by that value, highest first. Models the source has not scored on this benchmark are not listed — they are unmeasured, not last.
| Rank | Model | Provider | Public ViDoRe V3 retrieval |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Perplexity | 65.2 | |
| 2 | Perplexity | 62.3 |
Evidence key: Observed
Rows are ordered by the value Perplexity multimodal late-interaction embedding model card published, highest first. The source does not state whether a higher value is the better result, so this page does not either: for a benchmark that measures a rate of failure, read the table from the bottom.
What the benchmark measures and how its value is published, from the source’s own record.
ViDoRe V3 Image (Perplexity report) is an external benchmark published by Perplexity multimodal late-interaction embedding model card. Perplexity reports public ViDoRe V3 image retrieval nDCG@10 of 62.3 for the 0.6B model and 65.2 for the 9B model. The source rates its difficulty as visual document retrieval.
Each model's result is published by Perplexity multimodal late-interaction embedding model card as public ViDoRe V3 retrieval. ModelScale prints that value to 1 decimal place, exactly as published, and never converts or rescales it. This page ranks the 2 models that carry a published value, highest value first; a model the source never scored is left out rather than ranked at zero. The source does not state whether a higher value is the better result, so neither does this page.