Loading page…
Preferred languages
More languages supported by Google Translate
Open the selector to load the current language catalog.
Translations are provided by Google Translate.
Loading page…
Preferred languages
More languages supported by Google Translate
Open the selector to load the current language catalog.
Translations are provided by Google Translate.
Instruction Following benchmark
Gray Swan Indirect Prompt Injection, attack success at 15 attempts. Every model the catalog carries a published Gray Swan IPI (15 attempts) value for, ranked by that value.
Measures how often indirect prompt-injection attacks succeed within fifteen attempts. Lower scores mean greater resistance to the tested attacks.
13 models with a published Gray Swan IPI (15 attempts) value, ordered by that value, highest first. Models the source has not scored on this benchmark are not listed — they are unmeasured, not last.
What the benchmark measures and how its value is published, from the source’s own record.
Gray Swan IPI (15 attempts) (Gray Swan Indirect Prompt Injection, attack success at 15 attempts) is an instruction following benchmark published by Gemini 4 Argon evaluation methodology. Measures how often indirect prompt-injection attacks succeed within fifteen attempts. Lower scores mean greater resistance to the tested attacks. Its evaluation set is described by the source as indirect prompt-injection attacks. The source rates its difficulty as adversarial prompt injection.
Each model's result is published by Gemini 4 Argon evaluation methodology as attack success rate at 15 attempts. ModelScale prints that value to 1 decimal place, exactly as published, and never converts or rescales it. This page ranks the 13 models that carry a published value, highest value first; a model the source never scored is left out rather than ranked at zero. The source does not state whether a higher value is the better result, so neither does this page.
| 4 | OpenAI | 27.0 |
| 5 | Meta | 15.9 |
| 6 | OpenAI | 10.1 |
| 7 | OpenAI | 8.5 |
| 8 | 6.0 |
| 9 | 5.5 |
| 10 | Anthropic | 4.6 |
| 11 | Anthropic | 1.0 |
| 11 | Anthropic | 1.0 |
| 13 | 0.7 |
Evidence key: Observed
Rows are ordered by the value Gemini 4 Argon evaluation methodology published, highest first. The source does not state whether a higher value is the better result, so this page does not either: for a benchmark that measures a rate of failure, read the table from the bottom.