Loading page…
Preferred languages
More languages supported by Google Translate
Open the selector to load the current language catalog.
Translations are provided by Google Translate.
Loading page…
Preferred languages
More languages supported by Google Translate
Open the selector to load the current language catalog.
Translations are provided by Google Translate.
Knowledge benchmark
Axiom Bio morphology-to-molecule matching. Every model the catalog carries a published Morphology-to-molecule matching value for, ranked by that value.
Matches multi-channel cellular imaging data to the molecule-dose perturbations that produced it.
2 models with a published Morphology-to-molecule matching value, ordered by that value, highest first. Models the source has not scored on this benchmark are not listed — they are unmeasured, not last.
| Rank | Model | Provider | Matching accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anthropic | 34.0 | |
| 2 | Anthropic | 25.0 |
Evidence key: Observed
Rows are ordered by the value Claude Opus 5.5 System Card published, highest first. The source does not state whether a higher value is the better result, so this page does not either: for a benchmark that measures a rate of failure, read the table from the bottom.
What the benchmark measures and how its value is published, from the source’s own record.
Morphology-to-molecule matching (Axiom Bio morphology-to-molecule matching) is a knowledge benchmark published by Claude Opus 5.5 System Card. Matches multi-channel cellular imaging data to the molecule-dose perturbations that produced it. Its evaluation set is described by the source as four multi-channel cell-imaging perturbation-matching tasks. The source rates its difficulty as biomedical image and molecular reasoning.
Each model's result is published by Claude Opus 5.5 System Card as matching accuracy. ModelScale prints that value to 1 decimal place, exactly as published, and never converts or rescales it. This page ranks the 2 models that carry a published value, highest value first; a model the source never scored is left out rather than ranked at zero. The source does not state whether a higher value is the better result, so neither does this page.