Loading page…
Preferred languages
More languages supported by Google Translate
Open the selector to load the current language catalog.
Translations are provided by Google Translate.
Loading page…
Preferred languages
More languages supported by Google Translate
Open the selector to load the current language catalog.
Translations are provided by Google Translate.
Claude Haiku 5.5 by Anthropic scores 67.22 overall, costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.50 per 1M output tokens, and carries a context window of 1M tokens — observed 2026-10-23.
Anthropic · Proprietary · rank 26 · bench-align-v5
Seven axes from the ranking source. A missing axis is drawn as a gap.
Measured values with the date they were observed. Nothing is inferred from a sibling model or a provider claim.
Time to first token: latency to the first answer chunk (Artificial Analysis, via BenchLM). Reasoning models include thinking time, so values can run to tens or hundreds of seconds.
Evidence key: Observed
| Measurement | Value | Observed | Last good | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time to first token | 244.84 s | 2026-10-23 | 2026-10-23 | |
| Throughput | 237 tok/s | 2026-10-23 | 2026-10-23 |
Regional or per-endpoint measurements appear only when the API supplies them; none are modelled here.
Every published price component, including cache reads and writes.
10 conversations per day × 8 messages × 22 active days, 1200 input and 400 output tokens per message, no cache. This uses the same calculator as the cost simulator, so an unavailable applicable rate makes the example unavailable too.
35 matched benchmark rows with their published value, unit, and provenance.
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index | 43.4 | Cross-benchmark intelligence index | Display-only external reference | Artificial Analysis |
| AA-HLE Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam | 44.4 | Expert-level questions | Frontier expert reasoning | Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam Benchmark Leaderboard |
| AA-Omniscience Index Artificial Analysis Omniscience Index | 10.7 | Knowledge questions | Broad factual knowledge | AA-Omniscience: Knowledge and Hallucination Benchmark |
Lifecycle events the source associates with this model, plus what this profile does not claim.
| AA-Omniscience Accuracy Artificial Analysis Omniscience Accuracy |
| 36.4 |
| Knowledge questions |
| Broad knowledge |
| Artificial Analysis model benchmarks |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate Artificial Analysis Omniscience Hallucination Rate | 40.4 | Knowledge questions | Factuality | Artificial Analysis model benchmarks |
| HLE w/o tools Humanity's Last Exam without tools | 45.9 | Expert-level questions | Frontier expert level | Introducing GPT-5.4 mini and nano |
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode 1.1 Main FrontierCode 1.1 Main | 46.4 | 100 private Main tasks (150 in Extended) | Frontier coding-agent quality | FrontierCode leaderboard |
| FrontierSWE v2 FrontierSWE v2 | 43.8 | 34 ultra-long-horizon engineering and research tasks | Ultra-long-horizon frontier software engineering | FrontierSWE v2 |
| Bug Hunt Bench Bug Hunt Bench | 21.5 | 105 planted bugs across two production TypeScript repositories | Blind production-repository bug finding and repair | Bug Hunt Bench method, caveats, and definitions |
| AA-SciCode Artificial Analysis SciCode | 55.0 | Scientific coding subproblems | Scientific programming | Artificial Analysis SciCode Benchmark Leaderboard |
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) FrontierMath v2 Tiers 1-3 | 75.088 | 285 private advanced mathematics problems | From olympiad-plus to early research mathematics | FrontierMath v2 benchmark hub |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) FrontierMath v2 Tier 4 | 46.341 | 41 private extreme-difficulty mathematics problems | Research-level mathematics requiring hours or days of expert work | FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 leaderboard |
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1 ARC-AGI-1 Semi-Private Evaluation | 89.00 | Semi-private ARC-AGI-1 evaluation set | Abstract visual reasoning | ARC Prize leaderboard |
| ARC-AGI-2 Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus for AGI v2 | 61.25 | Visual pattern completion and abstract reasoning | Expert-level — hardest public reasoning benchmark | ARC-AGI-2: A Harder General Intelligence Benchmark |
| ARC-AGI-3 Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus for AGI v3 | 0.451371 | Interactive game-like tasks with hidden rules | Frontier agentic reasoning | ARC-AGI-3: A New Challenge for Frontier Agentic Intelligence |
| AA-LCR Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning | 82.7 | Long-context reasoning tasks | Long-context reasoning | Artificial Analysis model benchmarks |
| MLCR-AA Medical Long Context Reasoning (MLCR-AA) | 63.3 | Long, fragmented medical-record reasoning | Long-context medical reasoning | Medical Long Context Reasoning (MLCR-AA) |
| CritPt Critical Physics Tasks | 18.9 | Research-level physics questions | Research-level physics reasoning | CritPt Benchmark Leaderboard |
| ARC-AGI-3 Provider Adapter ARC-AGI-3 Semi-Private: Provider Adapter harness | 2.82 | — | — | ARC Prize verified ARC-AGI-3 results |
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 39.20 | 66 professional computer-work tasks | Frontier autonomous knowledge work | Terminal-Bench 4.0 |
| AA Briefcase Artificial Analysis Briefcase | 1578 | Professional knowledge-work tasks | Professional work | Artificial Analysis Briefcase Benchmark Leaderboard |
| AA AutomationBench Artificial Analysis AutomationBench | 35.4 | Business-process automation tasks | Agentic automation | Artificial Analysis AutomationBench Benchmark Leaderboard |
| AA Harvey LAB v1.0 Artificial Analysis Harvey LAB-AA v1.0 | 89.9 | Legal agent tasks | Professional legal work | Artificial Analysis Harvey LAB-AA Benchmark Leaderboard |
| HLE w/ tools Humanity's Last Exam with tools | 57.4 | Expert questions with tool use | Frontier tool-augmented reasoning | DeepSeek-V4 Technical Report |
| GDPval-AA GDPval-AA | 1620 | Agentic real-world work tasks | Professional agentic workflows | DeepSeek-V4 Technical Report |
| GDPval-AA GDPval-AA normalized | 55.9 | Economically valuable tasks | Professional agentic workflows | Artificial Analysis model benchmarks |
| AA Terminal-Bench 4.0 Artificial Analysis Terminal-Bench v4.0 | 32.8 | Terminal-based agent tasks | Agentic software engineering | Artificial Analysis Terminal-Bench v4.0 Benchmark Leaderboard |
| GDP.pdf Artificial Analysis GDP.pdf | 20.8 | Professional document-production tasks | Professional knowledge work | GDP.pdf Benchmark Leaderboard |
| AA-AnalystAgent Artificial Analysis AnalystAgent | 53.8 | Spreadsheet and document analysis questions | Business and data analysis | AA-AnalystAgent Benchmark Leaderboard |
| Hermes Index Hermes Index: agentic capability and cost per task inside Hermes Agent | 37.0 | Four suites: Hermes Bench (150 tasks), TerminalBench 4 without its 4 GPU tasks, TerminalBench Science and SkillsBench | Frontier agentic | Hermes Index: an agentic model leaderboard |
| Hermes Bench Hermes Bench: 150 agent tasks graded on the files and state the agent leaves behind | 71.0 | 150 tasks across 25 categories | Frontier agentic | Hermes Bench (Hermes Index) |
| MazeBench MazeBench: visual spatial reasoning in a 3D open world | 1 | 100 hidden gems across 256 rooms in one open world | Long-horizon spatial planning, with single puzzles that can take over one hundred moves | MazeBench Results |
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chartography (no tools) Chartography without tools | 46.4 | 100 specialized chart types | Professional chart reasoning | Chartography |
| Design Arena Website Design Arena Website Elo | 1263 | Website generation comparisons | Design and website generation | OpenRouter Grok 4.3 benchmarks |
| ParseBench ParseBench: document parsing for AI agents (LlamaIndex leaderboard) | 57.40 | 2,078 human-verified enterprise pages from insurance, finance and government documents | No method is strong on all five dimensions; charts and visual grounding separate the field | ParseBench: A Document Parsing Benchmark for AI Agents |