Loading page…
Preferred languages
More languages supported by Google Translate
Open the selector to load the current language catalog.
Translations are provided by Google Translate.
Loading page…
Preferred languages
More languages supported by Google Translate
Open the selector to load the current language catalog.
Translations are provided by Google Translate.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 by DeepSeek scores 65.66 overall, costs $0.30 per 1M input tokens and $1.20 per 1M output tokens, and carries a context window of 1M tokens — observed 2026-10-23.
DeepSeek · Open Weight · rank 35 · bench-align-v5
Seven axes from the ranking source. A missing axis is drawn as a gap.
Measured values with the date they were observed. Nothing is inferred from a sibling model or a provider claim.
Time to first token: latency to the first answer chunk (Artificial Analysis, via BenchLM). Reasoning models include thinking time, so values can run to tens or hundreds of seconds.
Evidence key: Observed
| Measurement | Value | Observed | Last good | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time to first token | 10.66 s | 2026-10-23 | 2026-10-23 | |
| Throughput | 209 tok/s | 2026-10-23 | 2026-10-23 |
Regional or per-endpoint measurements appear only when the API supplies them; none are modelled here.
Every published price component, including cache reads and writes.
10 conversations per day × 8 messages × 22 active days, 1200 input and 400 output tokens per message, no cache. This uses the same calculator as the cost simulator, so an unavailable applicable rate makes the example unavailable too.
51 matched benchmark rows with their published value, unit, and provenance.
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A | 90.9 | 448 questions | Graduate level | GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark |
| GPQA-D GPQA Diamond | 90.9 | Graduate-level science questions | Graduate level | GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark |
| HLE Humanity's Last Exam | 42.6 | Expert-level questions | Frontier expert level | Humanity's Last Exam |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index | 39.5 |
Lifecycle events the source associates with this model, plus what this profile does not claim.
That is not evidence the model has no lifecycle plan — only that this source published none.
| Cross-benchmark intelligence index |
| Display-only external reference |
| Artificial Analysis |
| AA-HLE Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam | 39.2 | Expert-level questions | Frontier expert reasoning | Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam Benchmark Leaderboard |
| AA-Omniscience Index Artificial Analysis Omniscience Index | -5.3 | Knowledge questions | Broad factual knowledge | AA-Omniscience: Knowledge and Hallucination Benchmark |
| AA-Omniscience Accuracy Artificial Analysis Omniscience Accuracy | 46.4 | Knowledge questions | Broad knowledge | Artificial Analysis model benchmarks |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate Artificial Analysis Omniscience Hallucination Rate | 96.5 | Knowledge questions | Factuality | Artificial Analysis model benchmarks |
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 90.6 | Terminal-based software-agent tasks | Professional software engineering | Terminal-Bench |
| Codeforces Codeforces Rating | 3471.0 | Competitive programming contests | Elite competitive programming | DeepSeek-V4 Technical Report |
| OpenHarmony Bench OpenHarmony Bench v1.0 | 60.3 | 153 app-development and bug-fix tasks | End-to-end OpenHarmony application development | OpenHarmony Bench: Evaluating LLMs and Coding Agents on OpenHarmony App Development |
| ProgramBench ProgramBench: Can Language Models Rebuild Programs From Scratch? | 29.1 | 200 program reconstruction tasks | Full-repository software architecture | ProgramBench: Can Language Models Rebuild Programs From Scratch? |
| Bug Hunt Bench Bug Hunt Bench | 39.1 | 105 planted bugs across two production TypeScript repositories | Blind production-repository bug finding and repair | Bug Hunt Bench method, caveats, and definitions |
| NL2Repo NL2Repo | 68.2 | Natural language to repository tasks | System-level software comprehension | MiniMax M2.7: Early Echoes of Self-Evolution |
| AA-SciCode Artificial Analysis SciCode | 51.9 | Scientific coding subproblems | Scientific programming | Artificial Analysis SciCode Benchmark Leaderboard |
| DeepSWE DeepSWE | 77.0 | 113 software engineering tasks across 91 repositories and 5 languages | Long-horizon software engineering | DeepSWE benchmark blog |
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apex Apex | 65.6 | Advanced mathematical reasoning | Frontier math reasoning | DeepSeek-V4 Technical Report |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) FrontierMath v2 Tiers 1-3 | 67.368 | 285 private advanced mathematics problems | From olympiad-plus to early research mathematics | FrontierMath v2 benchmark hub |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) FrontierMath v2 Tier 4 | 26.829 | 41 private extreme-difficulty mathematics problems | Research-level mathematics requiring hours or days of expert work | FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 leaderboard |
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-LCR Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning | 84.0 | Long-context reasoning tasks | Long-context reasoning | Artificial Analysis model benchmarks |
| MLCR-AA Medical Long Context Reasoning (MLCR-AA) | 22.8 | Long, fragmented medical-record reasoning | Long-context medical reasoning | Medical Long Context Reasoning (MLCR-AA) |
| CritPt Critical Physics Tasks | 14.3 | Research-level physics questions | Research-level physics reasoning | CritPt Benchmark Leaderboard |
| JevBench 1.4 JevBench 1.4 | 4.77 | 534 frozen v1.2 decisions plus 308 sealed v1.4 decisions | Typed decisions with sealed generalization tests | JevBench v1.4 method |
| JevBench 1.5 JevBench 1.5 | 6.65 | 904 open decisions plus 720 sealed decisions per complete run | Choice, Noul, and Score decisions with sealed generalization tests | JevBench v1.5 frozen method and disclosures |
| STEMBench STEMBench120: six-domain scientific research progress | 2.49 | 120 research tasks, 20 in each of six STEM domains | Open research targets; no run has reached a full-target success | STEMBench: six-domain model evaluation |
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 42.30 | 66 professional computer-work tasks | Frontier autonomous knowledge work | Terminal-Bench 4.0 |
| AA Briefcase Artificial Analysis Briefcase | 1420 | Professional knowledge-work tasks | Professional work | Artificial Analysis Briefcase Benchmark Leaderboard |
| AA AutomationBench Artificial Analysis AutomationBench | 68.9 | Business-process automation tasks | Agentic automation | Artificial Analysis AutomationBench Benchmark Leaderboard |
| AA ITBench Artificial Analysis ITBench-AA | 46.9 | IT incident-response tasks | Enterprise IT operations | Artificial Analysis ITBench-AA Benchmark Leaderboard |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 90.6 | Terminal-based software-agent tasks | Professional software engineering | Terminal-Bench |
| HLE w/ tools Humanity's Last Exam with tools | 63.9 | Expert questions with tool use | Frontier tool-augmented reasoning | DeepSeek-V4 Technical Report |
| GDPval-AA GDPval-AA | 1600 | Agentic real-world work tasks | Professional agentic workflows | DeepSeek-V4 Technical Report |
| GDPval-AA GDPval-AA normalized | 55.0 | Economically valuable tasks | Professional agentic workflows | Artificial Analysis model benchmarks |
| AA Terminal-Bench 4.0 Artificial Analysis Terminal-Bench v4.0 | 26.8 | Terminal-based agent tasks | Agentic software engineering | Artificial Analysis Terminal-Bench v4.0 Benchmark Leaderboard |
| GDP.pdf Artificial Analysis GDP.pdf | 12.8 | Professional document-production tasks | Professional knowledge work | GDP.pdf Benchmark Leaderboard |
| CyberGym CyberGym | 88.1 | 1,507 vulnerability analysis instances | Real-world cybersecurity | CyberGym: Evaluating AI Agents' Real-World Cybersecurity Capabilities at Scale |
| ExploitGym ExploitGym | 15.3 | 898 exploitation tasks | Advanced cybersecurity exploitation | ExploitGym: Can AI Agents Turn Security Vulnerabilities into Real Attacks? |
| AutomationBench AutomationBench | 60.5 | 600 public automation tasks | Long-horizon automation | Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence |
| Agents' Last Exam Agents' Last Exam | 35.4 | Agent tasks | Advanced agentic work | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 update |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) Terminal-Bench 2.1, Vals AI run | 74.5 | Difficult terminal tasks | Frontier agentic | Vals AI Terminal-Bench 2.1, Vals AI run leaderboard |
| CWE-bench v1 CWE-bench v1 | 55.0 | Audit and patch held-out C/C++, Go, Java, TypeScript/JavaScript, Python, and Rust repositories | Frontier agent evaluation | CWE-bench v1 leaderboard and methodology |
| Hermes Index Hermes Index: agentic capability and cost per task inside Hermes Agent | 36.9 | Four suites: Hermes Bench (150 tasks), TerminalBench 4 without its 4 GPU tasks, TerminalBench Science and SkillsBench | Frontier agentic | Hermes Index: an agentic model leaderboard |
| Hermes Bench Hermes Bench: 150 agent tasks graded on the files and state the agent leaves behind | 70.7 | 150 tasks across 25 categories | Frontier agentic | Hermes Bench (Hermes Index) |
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chartography (tools) Chartography with image and code tools | 83.0 | 100 specialized chart types | Professional chart reasoning | Chartography |
| AA-MMMU-Pro Artificial Analysis MMMU-Pro | 77.0 | Multimodal academic reasoning | Frontier multimodal | Artificial Analysis MMMU-Pro Benchmark Leaderboard |
| Design Arena Website Design Arena Website Elo | 1323 | Website generation comparisons | Design and website generation | OpenRouter Grok 4.3 benchmarks |
| BabyVision w/ Python BabyVision with Python | 92.5 | Visual perception tasks with Python | Fine-grained visual perception | Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence |
| ZeroBench w/ Python ZeroBench_main with Python | 51.0 | Visual reasoning questions with Python | Tool-augmented visual reasoning | Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence |
| ParseBench ParseBench: document parsing for AI agents (LlamaIndex leaderboard) | 65.72 | 2,078 human-verified enterprise pages from insurance, finance and government documents | No method is strong on all five dimensions; charts and visual grounding separate the field | ParseBench: A Document Parsing Benchmark for AI Agents |
| ExtractBench (LlamaIndex) ExtractBench: schema-guided enterprise document extraction (LlamaIndex leaderboard) | 87.11 | 370 documents, 4,869 pages, 8 business domains, 67 document types, each with a JSON Schema | Short documents are near solved; long record lists and grounding separate systems | ExtractBench: A Benchmark for Schema-Guided Enterprise Document Extraction |
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC-Bench Pro SEC-Bench Pro | 62.8 | Security engineering tasks | Advanced cybersecurity | Introducing GPT-5.6 |