Loading page…
Preferred languages
More languages supported by Google Translate
Open the selector to load the current language catalog.
Translations are provided by Google Translate.
Loading page…
Preferred languages
More languages supported by Google Translate
Open the selector to load the current language catalog.
Translations are provided by Google Translate.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi scores 64.57 overall, costs $0.14 per 1M input tokens and $0.28 per 1M output tokens, and carries a context window of 1M tokens — observed 2026-10-23.
Xiaomi · Open Weight · rank 39 · bench-align-v5
Seven axes from the ranking source. A missing axis is drawn as a gap.
Measured values with the date they were observed. Nothing is inferred from a sibling model or a provider claim.
Time to first token: latency to the first answer chunk (Artificial Analysis, via BenchLM). Reasoning models include thinking time, so values can run to tens or hundreds of seconds.
Evidence key: ObservedUnavailable
| Measurement | Value | Observed | Last good | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time to first token | Unavailable | Unavailable | Unavailable | |
| Throughput | Unavailable | Unavailable | Unavailable |
Regional or per-endpoint measurements appear only when the API supplies them; none are modelled here.
Every published price component, including cache reads and writes.
10 conversations per day × 8 messages × 22 active days, 1200 input and 400 output tokens per message, no cache. This uses the same calculator as the cost simulator, so an unavailable applicable rate makes the example unavailable too.
24 matched benchmark rows with their published value, unit, and provenance.
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index | 37.9 | Cross-benchmark intelligence index | Display-only external reference | Artificial Analysis |
| AA-HLE Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam | 35.1 | Expert-level questions | Frontier expert reasoning | Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam Benchmark Leaderboard |
| AA-Omniscience Index Artificial Analysis Omniscience Index | -12.7 | Knowledge questions | Broad factual knowledge | AA-Omniscience: Knowledge and Hallucination Benchmark |
Lifecycle events the source associates with this model, plus what this profile does not claim.
That is not evidence the model has no lifecycle plan — only that this source published none.
| AA-Omniscience Accuracy Artificial Analysis Omniscience Accuracy |
| 27.0 |
| Knowledge questions |
| Broad knowledge |
| Artificial Analysis model benchmarks |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate Artificial Analysis Omniscience Hallucination Rate | 54.4 | Knowledge questions | Factuality | Artificial Analysis model benchmarks |
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 87.6 | Terminal-based software-agent tasks | Professional software engineering | Terminal-Bench |
| ProgramBench ProgramBench: Can Language Models Rebuild Programs From Scratch? | 26.0 | 200 program reconstruction tasks | Full-repository software architecture | ProgramBench: Can Language Models Rebuild Programs From Scratch? |
| AA-SciCode Artificial Analysis SciCode | 51.3 | Scientific coding subproblems | Scientific programming | Artificial Analysis SciCode Benchmark Leaderboard |
| DeepSWE DeepSWE | 67.9 | 113 software engineering tasks across 91 repositories and 5 languages | Long-horizon software engineering | DeepSWE benchmark blog |
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-LCR Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning | 74.3 | Long-context reasoning tasks | Long-context reasoning | Artificial Analysis model benchmarks |
| CritPt Critical Physics Tasks | 12.0 | Research-level physics questions | Research-level physics reasoning | CritPt Benchmark Leaderboard |
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 28.80 | 66 professional computer-work tasks | Frontier autonomous knowledge work | Terminal-Bench 4.0 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 87.6 | Terminal-based software-agent tasks | Professional software engineering | Terminal-Bench |
| GDPval-AA GDPval-AA normalized | 55.4 | Economically valuable tasks | Professional agentic workflows | Artificial Analysis model benchmarks |
| OSWorld-Verified OSWorld-Verified | 80.8 | 369 real-world computer tasks (361 when eight Google Drive tasks are excluded) | Multi-step desktop and cross-application workflows | OSWorld |
| CyberGym CyberGym | 95.1 | 1,507 vulnerability analysis instances | Real-world cybersecurity | CyberGym: Evaluating AI Agents' Real-World Cybersecurity Capabilities at Scale |
| ExploitGym ExploitGym | 6.0 | 898 exploitation tasks | Advanced cybersecurity exploitation | ExploitGym: Can AI Agents Turn Security Vulnerabilities into Real Attacks? |
| JobBench JobBench | 61.2 | 130 tasks across 35 occupations | Professional multi-source workflows | JobBench: Aligning Agent Work With Human Will |
| Toolathlon-Verified Toolathlon-Verified | 73.6 | Verified multi-tool workflows | Advanced tool use | Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence |
| AutomationBench AutomationBench | 52.3 | 600 public automation tasks | Long-horizon automation | Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence |
| Agents' Last Exam Agents' Last Exam | 27.6 | Agent tasks | Advanced agentic work | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 update |
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-MMMU-Pro Artificial Analysis MMMU-Pro | 73.1 | Multimodal academic reasoning | Frontier multimodal | Artificial Analysis MMMU-Pro Benchmark Leaderboard |
| Benchmark | Value | Tasks | Difficulty | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ExploitBench ExploitBench v8-bench | 25 | V8 exploit synthesis runs | Browser exploitation and cybersecurity | ExploitBench |
| SEC-Bench Pro SEC-Bench Pro | 47.5 | Security engineering tasks | Advanced cybersecurity | Introducing GPT-5.6 |