Skip to main content
ModelScale

Compare

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Side by side: capability scores, runtime measurements and every published price component. A value no source returned stays explicitly unavailable.

Comparison set

Check two to four models below, then press Compare — the URL and evidence below only update once you do.

Decision evidence

Exact source values, missing states, and pair-derived deltas stay separate.

Capability shape

Exact capability values

Evidence key: ObservedUnavailable

Capability scores per model
CapabilityClaude Fable 5.1Qwen3.7 Flash
Agentic60.8Unavailable
Coding90.4Unavailable
Knowledge97.5Unavailable
Reasoning79.4Unavailable
Multimodal & GroundedUnavailableUnavailable
Instruction FollowingUnavailableUnavailable
MathUnavailableUnavailable
Overall84.5849.77

Runtime

Time to first token and throughput, exactly as the runtime source published them.

Time to first token: latency to the first answer chunk (Artificial Analysis, via BenchLM). Reasoning models include thinking time, so values can run to tens or hundreds of seconds.

Economics

Source rates plus a labelled 75% input / 25% output blended cost.

Runtime and price matrix

Runtime and price values per model
MetricClaude Fable 5.1
Qwen3.7 Flash
Input / 1M$10.00$0.03
Output / 1M$50.00$0.13
Cache read / 1M$0.25Unavailable
Cache write / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Blended / 1M (75% input / 25% output)$20.00$0.055
Cost per successful task (LiveBench)UnavailableUnavailable
Time to first token279.9 sUnavailable
Throughput69 tok/sUnavailable
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Release date2026-09-012026-07-27
AccessProprietaryProprietary

Decision deltas

Each row comes from the pair comparison source. A null basis or average stays unavailable rather than being inferred from the capability table.

No pair comparison was published for this selection.

The comparison source only publishes deltas for pairs it has evaluated. The capability and price tables above remain source-exact.