Loading page…
Preferred languages
More languages supported by Google Translate
Open the selector to load the current language catalog.
Translations are provided by Google Translate.
Loading page…
Preferred languages
More languages supported by Google Translate
Open the selector to load the current language catalog.
Translations are provided by Google Translate.
Reasoning benchmark
ARC-AGI-3 Semi-Private: Provider Adapter harness. Every model the catalog carries a published ARC-AGI-3 Provider Adapter value for, ranked by that value.
ARC Prize verified interactive reasoning results using a provider-specific stateful adapter, kept separate from Standard harness results.
8 models with a published ARC-AGI-3 Provider Adapter value, ordered by that value, highest first. Models the source has not scored on this benchmark are not listed — they are unmeasured, not last.
| Rank | Model | Provider | ARC-AGI-3 Provider Adapter |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OpenAI | 98.55 | |
| 2 | 97.30 | ||
| 3 | OpenAI | 96.18 |
What the benchmark measures and how its value is published, from the source’s own record.
ARC-AGI-3 Provider Adapter (ARC-AGI-3 Semi-Private: Provider Adapter harness) is a reasoning benchmark published by ARC Prize verified ARC-AGI-3 results. ARC Prize verified interactive reasoning results using a provider-specific stateful adapter, kept separate from Standard harness results.
One value per model is published by ARC Prize verified ARC-AGI-3 results. ModelScale prints that value to 2 decimal places, exactly as published, and never converts or rescales it. This page ranks the 8 models that carry a published value, highest value first; a model the source never scored is left out rather than ranked at zero. The source does not state whether a higher value is the better result, so neither does this page.
| 4 | 35.00 |
| 5 | OpenAI | 23.03 |
| 6 | xAI | 7.02 |
| 7 | Anthropic | 2.82 |
| 8 | OpenAI | 0.59 |
Evidence key: Observed
Rows are ordered by the value ARC Prize verified ARC-AGI-3 results published, highest first. The source does not state whether a higher value is the better result, so this page does not either: for a benchmark that measures a rate of failure, read the table from the bottom.