Loading page…
Preferred languages
More languages supported by Google Translate
Open the selector to load the current language catalog.
Translations are provided by Google Translate.
Loading page…
Preferred languages
More languages supported by Google Translate
Open the selector to load the current language catalog.
Translations are provided by Google Translate.
Agentic benchmark
Hermes Index: agentic capability and cost per task inside Hermes Agent. Every model the catalog carries a published Hermes Index value for, ranked by that value.
An index of agentic capability from Nous Research. It averages pass@1 scores on four suites, Hermes Bench, TerminalBench 4, TerminalBench Science and SkillsBench, with every run inside the Hermes Agent harness, and reports the mean cost per task beside the score.
17 models with a published Hermes Index value, ordered by that value, highest first. Models the source has not scored on this benchmark are not listed — they are unmeasured, not last.
| Rank | Model | Provider | Mean pass@1 score across four suites, with mean cost per task |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anthropic | 63.3 | |
| 2 | OpenAI | 57.1 | |
| 3 | OpenAI | 56.3 |
What the benchmark measures and how its value is published, from the source’s own record.
Hermes Index (Hermes Index: agentic capability and cost per task inside Hermes Agent) is an agentic benchmark published by Hermes Index: an agentic model leaderboard. An index of agentic capability from Nous Research. It averages pass@1 scores on four suites, Hermes Bench, TerminalBench 4, TerminalBench Science and SkillsBench, with every run inside the Hermes Agent harness, and reports the mean cost per task beside the score. Its evaluation set is described by the source as four suites: Hermes Bench (150 tasks), TerminalBench 4 without its 4 GPU tasks, TerminalBench Science and SkillsBench. The source rates its difficulty as frontier agentic.
Each model's result is published by Hermes Index: an agentic model leaderboard as mean pass@1 score across four suites, with mean cost per task. ModelScale prints that value to 1 decimal place, exactly as published, and never converts or rescales it. This page ranks the 17 models that carry a published value, highest value first; a model the source never scored is left out rather than ranked at zero. The source does not state whether a higher value is the better result, so neither does this page.
| 4 | Anthropic | 53.1 |
| 5 | OpenAI | 44.1 |
| 6 | xAI | 39.3 |
| 7 | Z.AI | 39.2 |
| 8 | Moonshot AI | 39.2 |
| 9 | 38.1 |
| 10 | Anthropic | 37.0 |
| 11 | DeepSeek | 36.9 |
| 12 | Alibaba | 36.2 |
| 13 | Z.AI | 35.0 |
| 14 | OpenAI | 33.9 |
| 15 | StepFun | 32.8 |
| 16 | Tencent | 26.1 |
| 17 | InclusionAI | 21.6 |
Evidence key: ObservedLast good
Rows are ordered by the value Hermes Index: an agentic model leaderboard published, highest first. The source does not state whether a higher value is the better result, so this page does not either: for a benchmark that measures a rate of failure, read the table from the bottom.