Agentic benchmark
OSWorld 2.0 leaderboard
Every model the catalog carries a published OSWorld 2.0 value for, ranked by that value.
CategoryAgentic
MeasureInteractive computer-use evaluation
Tasks108 long-horizon computer-use workflows
DifficultyLong-horizon professional workflows
A long-horizon computer-use benchmark covering realistic workflows across everyday and professional desktop tasks.
OSWorld 2.0 ranking
20 models with a published OSWorld 2.0 value, ordered by that value, highest first. Models the source has not scored on this benchmark are not listed — they are unmeasured, not last.
| Rank | Model | Provider | Interactive computer-use evaluation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  GPT-6 Astra | OpenAI | 72.6 |
| 2 |  Claude Opus 5 | Anthropic | 70.6 |
| 3 |  Muse Spark 1.3 | Meta | 66.9 |
| 4 | GPT-5.6 Sol | OpenAI | 62.6 |
| 5 |  Gemini 3.8 Flash | 59.0 | |
| 6 | GPT-5.6 Terra | OpenAI | 50.2 |
| 7 | Gemini 3.7 Flash | 47.9 | |
| 8 | GPT-5.6 Luna | OpenAI | 45.6 |
| 9 | Claude Fable 5.1 | Anthropic | 41.7 |
| 10 | Claude Opus 4.8 | Anthropic | 20.6 |
| 11 |  Qwen3.8 Max | Alibaba | 19.4 |
| 11 | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Alibaba | 19.4 |
| 13 | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | Anthropic | 18.2 |
| 14 | Muse Spark 1.1 | Meta | 14.2 |
| 15 | Claude Opus 4.7 | Anthropic | 13.9 |
| 16 | GPT-5.5 | OpenAI | 13.0 |
| 17 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Anthropic | 8.3 |
| 18 |  Kimi K2.6 | Moonshot AI | 4.6 |
| 18 |  MiniMax M3 | MiniMax | 4.6 |
| 20 | Qwen3.7 Plus | Alibaba | 2.8 |
Evidence key: Observed
Rows are ordered by the value OSWorld2.0: Benchmarking Computer Use Agents on Long-Horizon Real-World Tasks published, highest first. The source does not state whether a higher value is the better result, so this page does not either: for a benchmark that measures a rate of failure, read the table from the bottom.