Agentic benchmark
QwenClawBench leaderboard
Every model the catalog carries a published QwenClawBench value for, ranked by that value.
Qwen's internal OpenClaw-style benchmark for measuring broad real-world agent performance across practical productivity and research tasks.
QwenClawBench ranking
10 models with a published QwenClawBench value, ordered by that value, highest first. Models the source has not scored on this benchmark are not listed — they are unmeasured, not last.
| Rank | Model | Provider | End-to-end agent evaluation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alibaba | 64.3 | |
| 2 | Alibaba | 61.8 | |
| 3 | Alibaba | 59.0 | |
| 4 | Alibaba | 57.2 | |
| 5 | Moonshot AI | 54.3 | |
| 6 | Z.AI | 54.1 | |
| 7 | Alibaba | 53.4 | |
| 8 | Alibaba | 52.6 | |
| 9 | Anthropic | 52.3 | |
| 10 | Alibaba | 51.8 |
Evidence key: Observed
Rows are ordered by the value Qwen3.6 launch benchmarks published, highest first. The source does not state whether a higher value is the better result, so this page does not either: for a benchmark that measures a rate of failure, read the table from the bottom.