Knowledge benchmark
GPQA Diamond (Vals) leaderboard
GPQA Diamond, Vals AI run. Every model the catalog carries a published GPQA Diamond (Vals) value for, ranked by that value.
Vals AI’s independent run of the GPQA Diamond graduate-level science questions.
GPQA Diamond (Vals) ranking
50 models with a published GPQA Diamond (Vals) value, ordered by that value, highest first. Models the source has not scored on this benchmark are not listed — they are unmeasured, not last.
| Rank | Model | Provider | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 95.5 | ||
| 2 | OpenAI | 95.2 | |
| 3 | xAI | 94.7 | |
| 4 | 94.4 | ||
| 5 | 93.9 | ||
| 6 | Alibaba | 93.7 | |
| 7 | Anthropic | 93.4 | |
| 7 | Anthropic | 93.4 | |
| 7 | 93.4 | ||
| 10 | Anthropic | 93.2 | |
| 10 | OpenAI | 93.2 | |
| 12 | xAI | 92.9 | |
| 12 | Moonshot AI | 92.9 | |
| 14 | 92.7 | ||
| 14 | MiniMax | 92.7 | |
| 16 | Anthropic | 92.4 | |
| 16 | DeepSeek | 92.4 | |
| 18 | OpenAI | 91.7 | |
| 19 | xAI | 91.4 | |
| 20 | Meta | 91.2 | |
| 21 | OpenAI | 90.9 | |
| 22 | Anthropic | 90.2 | |
| 22 | Alibaba | 90.2 | |
| 24 | DeepSeek | 89.9 | |
| 25 | Moonshot AI | 89.1 | |
| 26 | Anthropic | 88.9 | |
| 26 | Alibaba | 88.9 | |
| 28 | xAI | 88.6 | |
| 29 | Z.AI | 88.1 | |
| 30 | 87.9 | ||
| 31 | Alibaba | 87.4 | |
| 32 | TMInkling | Thinking Machines Lab | 87.1 |
| 33 | MiniMax | 86.6 | |
| 34 | Z.AI | 86.4 | |
| 35 | NVIDIA | 86.1 | |
| 36 | Anthropic | 85.6 | |
| 36 | Z.AI | 85.6 | |
| 38 | InclusionAI | 84.8 | |
| 39 | Z.AI | 84.5 | |
| 40 | 83.8 | ||
| 41 | TMInkling-Small | Thinking Machines Lab | 83.6 |
| 42 | OpenAI | 83.1 | |
| 43 | Xiaomi | 82.6 | |
| 44 | Xiaomi | 81.6 | |
| 45 | 81.1 | ||
| 46 | OpenAI | 77.5 | |
| 47 | Anthropic | 72.2 | |
| 48 | Poolside | 55.1 | |
| 49 | Mistral | 34.8 | |
| 50 | Poolside | 27.0 |
Evidence key: Observed
Rows are ordered by the value Vals AI GPQA Diamond, Vals AI run leaderboard published, highest first. The source does not state whether a higher value is the better result, so this page does not either: for a benchmark that measures a rate of failure, read the table from the bottom.