Mathematics benchmark
HMMT Feb 2026 leaderboard
Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament February 2026. Every model the catalog carries a published HMMT Feb 2026 value for, ranked by that value.
CategoryMathematics
MeasureContest mathematics
TasksCompetition math problems
DifficultyOlympiad-style mathematics
Published byQwen3.6 launch benchmarks
A February 2026 HMMT slice used in newer frontier-model math comparisons.
HMMT Feb 2026 ranking
23 models with a published HMMT Feb 2026 value, ordered by that value, highest first. Models the source has not scored on this benchmark are not listed — they are unmeasured, not last.
| Rank | Model | Provider | Contest mathematics |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Qwen3.7 Max | Alibaba | 97.1 |
| 2 |  DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | DeepSeek | 95.2 |
| 3 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 | DeepSeek | 94.8 |
| 4 |  Solar Open 2 | Upstage | 93.9 |
| 5 | Qwen3.7 Plus | Alibaba | 92.9 |
| 6 |  Kimi K2.6 | Moonshot AI | 92.7 |
| 7 |  GLM-5.2 | Z.AI | 92.5 |
| 8 | TMInkling-Small | Thinking Machines Lab | 90.2 |
| 9 | Qwen3.5 397B | Alibaba | 87.9 |
| 10 | Qwen3.6 Plus | Alibaba | 87.8 |
| 11 | Kimi K2.5 | Moonshot AI | 87.1 |
| 12 |  Ling 3.0 Flash | InclusionAI | 87.0 |
| 13 | GLM-5 | Z.AI | 86.4 |
| 14 |  Claude Opus 4.5 | Anthropic | 85.3 |
| 15 |  MAI-Thinking-1 | Microsoft | 84.9 |
| 16 | Qwen3.6-27B | Alibaba | 84.3 |
| 17 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B | Alibaba | 83.6 |
| 18 | GLM-5.1 | Z.AI | 82.6 |
| 19 |  K-EXAONE 2.0 | LG AI Research | 78.4 |
| 20 | ZYZAYA1-8B | Zyphra | 71.6 |
| 21 | OPMiniCPM5-2B | OpenBMB | 63.8 |
| 22 |  LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse | Meituan | 40.5 |
| 23 | OPMiniCPM5-1B | OpenBMB | 25.8 |
Evidence key: Observed
Rows are ordered by the value Qwen3.6 launch benchmarks published, highest first. The source does not state whether a higher value is the better result, so this page does not either: for a benchmark that measures a rate of failure, read the table from the bottom.