Mathematics benchmark
IMOAnswerBench leaderboard
Every model the catalog carries a published IMOAnswerBench value for, ranked by that value.
A challenging mathematical reasoning benchmark reported in DeepSeek-V4 model evaluations.
IMOAnswerBench ranking
9 models with a published IMOAnswerBench value, ordered by that value, highest first. Models the source has not scored on this benchmark are not listed — they are unmeasured, not last.
| Rank | Model | Provider | Pass@1 math benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DSdots3-note Preview | Dots Studio | 90.9 |
| 2 | Alibaba | 90.0 | |
| 3 | DeepSeek | 89.8 | |
| 4 | DeepSeek | 88.4 | |
| 5 | Alibaba | 86.0 | |
| 6 | InclusionAI | 83.7 | |
| 7 | LG AI Research | 78.6 | |
| 8 | ZYZAYA1-8B | Zyphra | 59.3 |
| 9 | Meituan | 49.4 |
Evidence key: Observed
Rows are ordered by the value DeepSeek-V4 Technical Report published, highest first. The source does not state whether a higher value is the better result, so this page does not either: for a benchmark that measures a rate of failure, read the table from the bottom.