Skip to main content
ModelScale

Multimodal & Grounded benchmark

Liquid Extract JSON Validity leaderboard

Liquid image-to-JSON extraction JSON validity. Every model the catalog carries a published Liquid Extract JSON Validity value for, ranked by that value.

CategoryMultimodal & Grounded
MeasureStrict JSON parseability rate
TasksImage-to-JSON extraction
DifficultyStructured visual extraction

A display-only Liquid AI extraction metric measuring the share of image-to-JSON outputs that parse as strict JSON.

Liquid Extract JSON Validity ranking

2 models with a published Liquid Extract JSON Validity value, ordered by that value, highest first. Models the source has not scored on this benchmark are not listed — they are unmeasured, not last.

Models ranked by their published Liquid image-to-JSON extraction JSON validity value
RankModelProviderStrict JSON parseability rate
1LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractLiquidAI99.6
2LFM2.5-VL-450M-ExtractLiquidAI98.9

Evidence key: Observed

Rows are ordered by the value LiquidAI LFM2.5-VL Extract model cards published, highest first. The source does not state whether a higher value is the better result, so this page does not either: for a benchmark that measures a rate of failure, read the table from the bottom.

All leaderboards