Reasoning benchmark
LongBench v2 leaderboard
Every model the catalog carries a published LongBench v2 value for, ranked by that value.
A long-context benchmark that measures whether models can actually use extended context windows for reasoning and retrieval.
LongBench v2 ranking
14 models with a published LongBench v2 value, ordered by that value, highest first. Models the source has not scored on this benchmark are not listed — they are unmeasured, not last.
| Rank | Model | Provider | Extended-context retrieval and reasoning |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alibaba | 66.3 | |
| 2 | Anthropic | 64.4 | |
| 3 | Alibaba | 63.2 | |
| 4 | Alibaba | 62 | |
| 5 | NVIDIA | 61.9 | |
| 6 | Moonshot AI | 61 | |
| 7 | Z.AI | 60.8 | |
| 8 | Alibaba | 60.6 | |
| 9 | InternScience | 60.2 | |
| 9 | Alibaba | 60.2 | |
| 11 | Alibaba | 59 | |
| 12 | InternScience | 52.1 | |
| 13 | OPMiniCPM5-2B | OpenBMB | 43.7 |
| 14 | InclusionAI | 34.99 |
Evidence key: Observed
Rows are ordered by the value LongBench v2 published, highest first. The source does not state whether a higher value is the better result, so this page does not either: for a benchmark that measures a rate of failure, read the table from the bottom.